Skip to comments.
China delivers blunt warning to U.S.
UPI ^
Posted on 07/16/2004 6:36:27 AM PDT by milestogo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-193 next last
1
posted on
07/16/2004 6:36:27 AM PDT
by
milestogo
To: Jeff Head
Dragon's Fury ping.
2
posted on
07/16/2004 6:37:54 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: milestogo
The United States must cease its interference with Chinese internal affairs....
Beijing is becoming increasingly frustrated that the United States does not regard this matter as urgent...
Which is it?
4
posted on
07/16/2004 6:42:12 AM PDT
by
texasflower
(in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
To: texasflower
Maybe they'll cut us off from all their Wal Mart junk.
To: Lowell
What do you think China can throw at us that would be effective?
6
posted on
07/16/2004 6:48:32 AM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Shryke
7
posted on
07/16/2004 6:49:51 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
No. China does not have one billion peopple in its army. Additionally, even if they did manage to put a gun in one billion people's hands, how would they ever manage to get those people here? Much less supply them?
8
posted on
07/16/2004 6:51:42 AM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Dead Corpse
make that 2 Billion, at least
9
posted on
07/16/2004 6:54:56 AM PDT
by
camas
To: Shryke
10
posted on
07/16/2004 6:55:48 AM PDT
by
kittycroft
(We don't let people have guns. Why should we let them have ideas? - Stalin)
To: milestogo
You can thank NIXON for all this BS
11
posted on
07/16/2004 6:57:51 AM PDT
by
uncbob
To: Shryke
12
posted on
07/16/2004 6:57:53 AM PDT
by
cyborg
To: Shryke
Didn't we once have the same concerns, and the same doubts, about Japan? How did that work out?
13
posted on
07/16/2004 7:00:31 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Shryke
Agreed. Taiwan would be completely different to Korea, where they only had to get across the Yalu.
To: Shryke
The have ICBM's capable of reaching the US. They have one SSBN. They at this time do not have enough fire power to knock us out but they do have enough to hurt us. My thoughts is it will be conventional and they will try to cost us as much lifes as they can hoping we back out.
15
posted on
07/16/2004 7:00:56 AM PDT
by
TXBSAFH
(Power corrupts..... Absolute power can be fun.)
To: milestogo
Ok. Well. We'll soon see how they like 7 carrier battle groups off their coast.
16
posted on
07/16/2004 7:02:44 AM PDT
by
narby
(Democrat = Internationalist ... Republican = American)
To: uncbob
Yup, Nixon was one of the worst president ever.
17
posted on
07/16/2004 7:02:46 AM PDT
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: milestogo
The sooner we fight the better.
All this Islam crap is just a prelude to the main event anyway.
To: kittycroft
Kitty, it is higly doubtful, IMHO, that a Chinese sub could get within striking distance of one of our carrier groups. In reality I think that a Chinese sub (or several of them) that approached a carrier group in a hostile manner would be sunk before they knew it.
19
posted on
07/16/2004 7:03:03 AM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Shryke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-193 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson