Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: baseballfanjm
"During the American Revolution, or the Civil War, militias couldn't form without the ability of the common man to take up his own arms."

Actually, it was during the War of 1812 that the militias were found inferior to a federal army. When the war was over, the militias essentially went away as a separate fighting force.

Yes, the citizen was to be armed -- at least, those who fit the definition (males between a certain age). They were to be armed, they had a right to be armed, because they may be needed to secure a free state. It was that right that was protected from infringement by the federal government.

243 posted on 07/18/2004 4:01:00 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
They were to be armed, they had a right to be armed, because they may be needed to secure a free state. It was that right that was protected from infringement by the federal government.

Yes, that right is protected. Those rights still stand under the Constitution. According to the Constitution, it's vital for the citizens to be able rise and defend themselves, outside of the Army, if necessary. And unless citizens can keep their own arms, there's no way that can happen.

245 posted on 07/18/2004 4:27:15 PM PDT by baseballfanjm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson