And so y'all agree to appoint another tyrant, another beyond Sarah Brady, to define a cannon's caliber. Is .50 inch an 'arm' or a cannon?
Is a .223 inch bursting charge fired from an 'arm' or a cannon? Come come, lets be specific about the hairs we split.
Which part of 'infringed' do you not understand? Or are y'all Narional Reasonable-regulation Ass. members or worse?
.50 cal falls under the definition of arms. It isn't until you break into the 1.0 cal that the definition becomes grey. We folk in the military classify all arms as ordnance, but only for supply purposes. The term is accepted as artillery or delivered weaponry.
It is an arm. If it were .6 inch, it would be classified by BAFT as a destructive device.
Do I think the .5 vs .6 caliber is a common sense approach or supported by the constitution?
No, but it is what will be used by BAFT to toss you in jail.