To: buccaneer81; hummingbird; B4Ranch
<< It was a missile. >>
Rubbish.
It was a walked-on bomb.
[The "missile" mis-information was, just as was the whoremonica hoo-har, (Though both distractions contained sufficient truth as to confuse) a deliberate red-herring to first arouse -- and to then shift the focus on to -- the fringe delusionals -- and to thus more easily detract from much larger and more awful evils. Treason and the like]
<< The "center fuel tank explosion" theory is a joke. Never happened before or after on a 747. >>
Absolutely true.
BUMPping
11 posted on
07/16/2004 10:22:02 PM PDT by
Brian Allen
(I am a Hyphenated American -- Thank God -- An AMERICAN-American! -- And a Dollar-A-Day FReeper.)
To: Brian Allen
[The "missile" mis-information was, just as was the whoremonica hoo-har, (Though both distractions contained sufficient truth as to confuse) a deliberate red-herring to first arouse -- and to then shift the focus on to -- the fringe delusionals -- and to thus more easily detract from much larger and more awful evils. Treason and the like]
One thing I hate worse than "red herrings" is missing a "red herring" and having to have it pointed out to me! From what I've read on FR and various books Clinton-related, this is totally believable. Pity...
22 posted on
07/17/2004 11:51:42 AM PDT by
hummingbird
("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson