Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Animal rights v science: battle over new vivisection lab at Oxford turns violent
The Guardian ^ | Monday July 19, 2004 | Alok Jha

Posted on 07/19/2004 7:46:42 AM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2004 7:46:44 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I'd be willing to wager that these terrorists would scream bloody murder if a right-to-life organization did the same things to an abortion clinic. I'd also be willing to wager that they have no problem at all with fetal stem-cell research.


2 posted on 07/19/2004 7:50:24 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("This house is sho' gone crazy!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Once these ALF terrorists are caught, they should be great candidates for animal experiments.


3 posted on 07/19/2004 7:53:50 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It is us vs them, and there are a lot of them amongst us.


4 posted on 07/19/2004 7:54:27 AM PDT by blanknoone (The NAACP --->NAADP National Association for the Advancement of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Sounds like a

HATE CRIME

to me, it's about time this crap was prosectued as such.
5 posted on 07/19/2004 7:59:36 AM PDT by locochupacabra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone

I use to be an animal rights activist. I am still vegetarian and have been for over 10 years. However as my mother always taught me, you get more with honey, then you do with vinegar. Meaning, I get more positive response by sitting and chatting with people about being vegetarian, rather then shoving it down thier throats with protests and violence. I think people like the ALF give me and people like me a bad name.


6 posted on 07/19/2004 8:00:04 AM PDT by Jivana108 (Dont mistake kindness for weakness...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Makes me yearn for the good old days of the Coalition for the Liberation of Itenerant Tree-dwellers or even the Liberate Animals Before Imprisoning Animals movements.


7 posted on 07/19/2004 8:03:03 AM PDT by ICX (To think that all problems could be solved if people behaved responsibly is irresponsible!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I wish that people who want to ban animal testing outright would have the courage of their convictions. Say "No" to childhood vaccinations, surgery, poison treatments, HIV treatment, stroke rehab, bypass, TENS therapy, etc.

This would be for both themselves and their children, of course, since human life and animal life are of equal value.


8 posted on 07/19/2004 8:07:17 AM PDT by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Have you ever met an animal rights advocate(so-called) who was pro-life? Nope, me neither.


9 posted on 07/19/2004 8:09:21 AM PDT by RexBeach (Before God makes you greedy, he makes you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Is "vivisection" the British word for animal testing? In the US it has connotations of brutal torture, flaying open the skin of an animal while it is still living.


10 posted on 07/19/2004 8:12:32 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I hope PETA's happy. Their connections to this dark underbelly of ecoterrorism is well established. Maybe Pam Naderson (spelling emphasized) and her watermelon friends would like to explain the innocent actions of PETA when it lands people out of work because their destruction causes hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of damage to private enterprise.

Just for all the PETA idiots out there, I will be feasting on a 24oz. Porterhouse tonight. I'll probably throw in some chicken wings as an appetizer.


11 posted on 07/19/2004 8:17:31 AM PDT by mattdono ([mattdono to John Kerry]: I voted for you...right before I voted against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jivana108

Whether ALF gives you a bad name is determined by who you are. If you simply choose to eat only plants, then it does not. If you intend to acheive the same ends (animal testing/eating) than it does to some extent.

Quick Quiz: Do animals have rights or are rights a uniquely human concept?


12 posted on 07/19/2004 8:17:38 AM PDT by blanknoone (The NAACP --->NAADP National Association for the Advancement of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The battle at Oxford is shaping up to be the biggest test so far of the government's commitment to research using animals. Tony Blair has passionately argued the case for such research, but scientists want the prime minister to match this commitment with action.

What may not be known to our American readers is that the Labour Government always talks tough on terrorism, however it's record on dealing with homegrown terrorists can pretty much be described as "do nothing". This group is hardly discouraged by Tony Blair's words, is it? ALF et al have grown brave because the government has passed the buck, saying it was the responsibility of the local police forces to prevent these terrorist attacks. Result: small local towns have been lumbered with multi-million pound policing bills due to the protection that has to be offered to the labs. Then the local populace turns against the companies. It really annoys me. The government could break these lunatics with ease if they wanted to. Slap 50 year jail sentences on the leaders and it would all be over. But it's the usual Labour case of "all mouth and no action".

13 posted on 07/19/2004 8:22:20 AM PDT by alnitak ("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I can't believe ALF would do such a thing...


14 posted on 07/19/2004 8:24:39 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Psalm 73)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone

I would say that I wish that everyone could be vegetarian and not do testing on animals, but that wish is unrealistic. Most of these animal rights activists actually believe that they can a achieve a goal one day of a vegetarian planet, I do not believe this can or will happen. Everyone has a choice, and I respect that. I choose to be vegetarian and not support companies that do testing on animals. If someone wishes to know why I live this way, I will be more than willing to discuss it. Otherwise, I see no sense in protesting fur factories or animal testing labs, simply because it doesnt work. My way of not supporting these companies, or protesting them, is simply by not giving them my money.


15 posted on 07/19/2004 8:26:13 AM PDT by Jivana108 (Dont mistake kindness for weakness...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
Well, as a Christian of the traditional variety, I'd have to say human beings have both rights and stewardship over animals. Animals don't have rights but our stewardship demands that we treat them as well as possible and avoid misusing them.
16 posted on 07/19/2004 8:27:04 AM PDT by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gingersnap

I also agree with this. In the Bible it says that humans will have "dominion" over animals. Parents have dominion over thier children, but they dont eat them...


17 posted on 07/19/2004 8:35:11 AM PDT by Jivana108 (Dont mistake kindness for weakness...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Ya know, the schools are doing a good job teaching the kids not to test on animals. My 8 yr old was looking at the shampoo bottle one day and I asked her why. "I want to make sure they don't test on animals". Why? "They came from the nature center and talked about it to us." I then had to explain to her that alot of very good things came about because of animal testing. I think she understood, and I don't think that side had even been addressed at school! Geez!!


18 posted on 07/19/2004 8:37:15 AM PDT by curlewbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curlewbird

While I agree with you that in school they should be teaching fair and balanced, you would be surprised at how much of the testing on animals is just plain not necessary and extremely frivolous. While I do believe that there are companies out there with a conscience and a sincere attempt to help humanity, there are more companies out there with a demonic attitude and I believe do this sort of thing for fun, or without sincerity.


19 posted on 07/19/2004 8:48:53 AM PDT by Jivana108 (Dont mistake kindness for weakness...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jivana108

Oh I don't know about that.

When my kids get out of line I kill em, clean em & cook them and serve them up with a tangy mustard sauce. Then after dinner I grab the wife and start making another that looks just like the first!

You don't eat your children?


20 posted on 07/19/2004 9:16:27 AM PDT by 50 Cal (Next time you think nobody cares if you exist just don't pay the IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson