Thanks.
Mark Levin for National Review has written an article about why the docs were stolen.
http://www.nationalreview.com/levin/levin200404151634.asp
Correction: Mark Levin wrote the article in April 2004 but the freeper headlined the thread Why the Docs were Stolen
In other words, the "wall of separation" constructed by Jamie Gorelick made it virtually impossible for U.S. authorities to stop Ahmed Rassam, the "Millenium Bomber," by design or intention. It was left to blind luck. The NSC's Millennium After Action Review — which, based on Attorney General Ashcroft's testimony, must be devastating in its analysis of not only this event but of the Gorelick policy — remains classified. And, most significantly, it's likely the Review's criticisms and warnings were either ignored or rejected by the Clinton Justice Department.
So that's why it was so important to rewrite.
I believe they have the smoking gun!
According to Levin's article and Ashcroft's testimony, the hunt for the terrorists should have begun in FULL FORCE in 2000.
Secondly, the Millenial plot review information, according to Ashcroft, was not passed on to Pres. Bush's administration. The critical conclusion in that review was that there was a network of AQ operatives within the US that needed to be uprooted via aggressive enforcement of immigration laws and other legal tactics. THIS IS VERY DAMNING EVIDENCE FOLKS!
Thirdly, Burger was caught red handed -- hopefully on video tape! In due time I believe it will be proven that Gorelick tried to clean things up from within the commission.
Ashcroft's 9/11 testimony is the Rosetta stone, as far as I can tell it looks pretty bad for the dims.