I forget which comedian called Bush a "tax-cut-and-spend Republican", but it's rang around inside my noggin ever since.
You can't cut taxes and NOT cut spending. It'll be his downfall, then ours.
If we don't find a way to wean people off the gub'mint teat, we'll be living in a "glorious workers' paradise" - and we all know how well THOSE turn out.
IOW, Bush is just helping to further the Dems' plan to turn us into a poor, third-world communist dictatorship; the only difference is, it's happening at a slower rate than it would if Gore had won, or if Kerry wins. If Bush doesn't grow a pair and start cutting SOMETHING - he COULD have refrained from giving more to the subsidized-"art" pogrom called National Endowment for the Arts, but he couldn't even veto THAT!
Just once, George. Just cut ONE spending increase. Show us you can be a fiscal conservative. Screw those liberals.
Well, we must come with some new ideas. Bush cannot cut any funding to any social program that most Republicans, including Libertarians, don't want him to cut--like all of the goddess worshipping feminazi funding programs to put dads in the prison industry, for a good example. Those programs are expensive, too.
http://www.sacredheart.edu/news/archives/foster/
"President Of Feminist For Life Of America To Address Sacred Heart"
Sacred Heart University
[Read the third paragraph for the surprise! It reports that Feminists
for Life (oxymoron) helps to make laws against fathers, and therefore,
laws against families instead of laws against abortion!]
I happen to know that there are a lot of divorce lawyers who are Libertarians. If they don't mind giving up their careers and taking family breaking, divorce breeding immoralities out of their Platform, I will join them.
We can't cut those wasteful spending programs without some kind of end run. Maybe instead of simply securing Taiwan against China right now, we could pick a fight with China, instead. Then we'd have an excuse to work against the wishes of most Republican and Libertarian constituents. Now that would be a good excuse to cut funding to social programs. And in the process, we'd kick some ___ where it needs kicking.