Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/20/2004 8:50:21 AM PDT by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: qam1

The Congresscritters are exempt from SS. Not sure about the Prez.


2 posted on 07/20/2004 8:52:36 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; tortoise; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; malakhi; m18436572; ...
Xer Ping

Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social aspects that directly effects Gen-Reagan/Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations (i.e. The Baby Boomers) are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.

Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.

3 posted on 07/20/2004 8:53:00 AM PDT by qam1 (Tommy Thompson is a Fat-tubby, Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

Neat! Now how soon can we rid the U.S. public of this sham called Socialists' Security?


4 posted on 07/20/2004 8:55:27 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
Contrary to politician-speak, Social Security doesn't need to be saved.

It needs to have a stake driven through its heart.

5 posted on 07/20/2004 8:58:37 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

If all dollars currently going to SS are placed in a PRA, how is SS going to be funded? I assume it would be out of the general fund, which would require either more taxes or more debt. I'm not saying that SS diesn't need to be overhauled, it just seems that the Heritage Foundation is leaving that part of the equation out of their analysis.


6 posted on 07/20/2004 9:03:12 AM PDT by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1
But for middle-class Americans, the differences could be significant.

For any American the difference would be significant. Starting at age 25, making only $25,000/year and investing just the amount that goes into Social Security (roughly 15% or $3750/year) each year after 40 years a person would have $580,357.37 at a paltry 6% growth rate.

BTW, the Heritage.Org calculator showed me with a return rate of -0.52% using only age/gender criteria. NICE investment USA!

7 posted on 07/20/2004 9:04:28 AM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

I know Sarah Yoest Pederson. I just can't remember from where. Any info on her?


11 posted on 07/20/2004 10:12:46 AM PDT by GVnana (Tagline? I don't need no stinkin' tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: qam1

From the retirement age of 67 until the average lifespan of 72 (only five years), you will draw a total of $87,408.00 from the $222,000 you paid into the Social Security system during your working life.

Are we brainwashed, suckers or what???


14 posted on 07/20/2004 10:42:53 AM PDT by FireTrack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson