Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ginsberg: "Kerry Must Answer This ESSENTIAL Point Re: Sandy Berger"
My videotape of Fox Interview. ^ | 7-20-04 | Ben Ginsberg

Posted on 07/20/2004 9:06:44 AM PDT by Matchett-PI

The following excerpt was transcribed by me from my videotape of the 5 minute segment on Fox News Channel this morning entitled, "Bracing For Battle". The segment began at 9:44 AM and ended at 9:49 AM Eastern.

Guests: Richard Goodstein, Democrat strategist and former advisor to the 2000 Gore/Lieberman Campaign

Ben Ginsberg, Election law expert, and national counsel for the Bush/Cheney 2004 Campaign. (He was also counsel to Bush/Cheney during the 2000 election re-count)

Bottom line excerpt:

Ben Ginsberg: "The essential point is, did Sandy Berger, who is one of John Kerry's top advisors, get those documents - those classified documents that he was stuffing down his pants in the National Archives - to the Kerry Campaign for their benefit? And that's an essential question that needs to be answered by the Kerry Campaign. Did they benefit from documents and information they should not have had?"

(Excerpt) Read more at freerepublic.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benginsberg; bergertreason; cityofevil; cornell; electionlaw; fox; ginsberg; ithaca; sandyberger; sloppy; sockgate; soxgate; traitorberger; treasongate; trousergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-208 next last
Don't allow the media to focus your attention on Clinton over this Sandy Berger criminal investigation. Ben Ginsberg points out the essential question --- and it has to do with the KERRY CAMPAIGN
1 posted on 07/20/2004 9:06:51 AM PDT by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Ah...Ben Ginsberg...my heart almost stopped for a minute when I thought it was Ruth Vader...
2 posted on 07/20/2004 9:08:57 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I'm going on vacation in 10 days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldglory; MinuteGal; Luke FReeman; gonzo; sheikdetailfeather; mcmuffin; Mustang; Bob Ireland; ...

BTTT!! Ping!


3 posted on 07/20/2004 9:10:10 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Berger Docugate ping


The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000

ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS


4 posted on 07/20/2004 9:11:31 AM PDT by votelife (Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Hope the story has legs ping!


5 posted on 07/20/2004 9:11:50 AM PDT by pushforbush ("How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!" --Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
Ah...Ben Ginsberg...my heart almost stopped for a minute when I thought it was Ruth Vader...

And rightly so.

6 posted on 07/20/2004 9:12:06 AM PDT by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: votelife

Thanks! BTTT!


7 posted on 07/20/2004 9:13:25 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

I read Ginsberg and thought the same thing, LOL.

Could someone explain to me how these memos might have helped the Kerry campaign?

The missing pages are about the Millenium Terror plot, and my first thought was that they were just trying to hide the facts surrounding it (because Clinton and croonies certainly embellished their part in preventing terror).

How would that help Kerry?

Inquiring minds need to know.


8 posted on 07/20/2004 9:13:34 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: votelife

if the kerry campaign is involved in a coverup of bergers pants will it be called weinergate...

t

>jibjab.com< try it it's funny


9 posted on 07/20/2004 9:13:58 AM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

You are correct, we shouldn't be distracted from the key points of this story by more Clintonian BS.

The most important question is this: What did the missing documents say?

Everything else is designed to distract from that pertinent question.


10 posted on 07/20/2004 9:14:51 AM PDT by Badeye ("The day you stop learning, is the day you begin dying")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

I guess I'm dating myself, but I first thought of Alan or Ralph.


11 posted on 07/20/2004 9:15:35 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

The docs were taken last October. How does that impact Kerry? Kerry does not seem to be able to plan ahead more than one photo-op at a time? I think this is pure CYA for Clinton. Berger would ONLY steal from a secure area under a dire threat: Exposure or Arkancide!


12 posted on 07/20/2004 9:17:22 AM PDT by maica (Hitlary says; "We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; Howlin; Dog
Did they benefit from documents and information they should not have had?"

I watched this also

Carl Cameron is reporting the Kerry Camp has no comment regarding Sandy

13 posted on 07/20/2004 9:17:54 AM PDT by Mo1 (50 States .... I want all 50 States come November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

You are right about the Millenium Terror thing. The only reason they caught Ressam was because an alert customs agent thought the guy looked suspicious (he was sweating profusly) and because Ressam gave two different answers to the same question just moments apart. It was blind luck, but Clinton used it as a prime (if not THE prime) example of his administrations' commitment to anti-terrorism.


14 posted on 07/20/2004 9:18:25 AM PDT by johnfrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pushforbush
"Hope the story has legs ping!"

We must make sure we don't allow the media to get away with headlines like, "Former CLINTON national security advisor, Sandy Berger...blah, blah, blah".

This ties in to the KERRY campaign. The headlines should read, "Sandy Berger, advisor to the 2004 Kerry Campaign.....", etc., etc.

BTTT

15 posted on 07/20/2004 9:18:36 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

Not Moe?


16 posted on 07/20/2004 9:18:56 AM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
My short list of issues that need to be adressed John Kerry.

1. How does he explain his wish to get the UN involved in Iraq in light of massive corruption, bribery, and scandal within the UN?

2. He needs to firmly oppose or support the house democrats that have called for UN intervention in our elections.

3. he needs to give some clue as to his opinions on the revelation that sandy berger was stealing classified documents.
17 posted on 07/20/2004 9:18:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (John kerry is unbalanced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

The only thing about these documents that would help Kerry is to get Clinton and company off of his back.

I believe Kerry did not get these documents but it is guilt by association with Berger being an advisor to Kerry. The luck of Kerry.

I wonder if Kerry even knew if this investigation was going on. If he did he would have never put Berger on as an advisor.


18 posted on 07/20/2004 9:19:30 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
[D]id Sandy Berger . . . get those documents . . . to the Kerry Campaign for their benefit?
19 posted on 07/20/2004 9:20:12 AM PDT by Petronski (Nobody "inadvertently" takes sensitive docs in their pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
So David Gergen thinks this is more innocent than it looks because he knows Berger? Gergen does not yet know what motivates even the 'best' Liberal by now?

Senator Lieberman offers that it probably was inadvertant?

One only has to read Berger's statement to see the lie being crafted for public consumption.

But one thing that cannot be disguised; 'he hid them in his pockets and his socks'; inadvertantly?

Threw them out accidentally?

Go after this Liberal trickster/traitor; for all it's worth.

20 posted on 07/20/2004 9:20:49 AM PDT by cricket (The starting point for Liberals is the lie. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
"Could someone explain to me how these memos might have helped the Kerry campaign?"

Follow the lead of Ben Ginsberg -- he KNOWS what the *essential* questions are that Kerry must answer. Hahaha.

21 posted on 07/20/2004 9:21:04 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Thats not Ruth Bader it's Ruth Buzzi!


22 posted on 07/20/2004 9:22:04 AM PDT by jslade (People who are easily offended, OFFEND ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
"How would that help Kerry? Inquiring minds need to know."

Actually, it's in Senator Kerry's ball-court to explain why he has hired an admitted thief of national security documents to be his national security advisor for his current Presidential campaign.

9 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires

23 posted on 07/20/2004 9:22:23 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
Could someone explain to me how these memos might have helped the Kerry campaign?

Maybe a twisted "October surprise." Kerry can accuse the administration of not taking the strategy outlined in the classified documents (without revealing he's seen them) and make it look like it's the steps he would have taken to prevent 9/11.

24 posted on 07/20/2004 9:23:09 AM PDT by rabidralph (My pit bull drives an SUV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
"How would that help Kerry? " Wasn't; isn't, Kerry on the National Security commitee? Also, would guess that Berger's action was as much to protect Clinton/Hillary as well; and of course, Berger's own behind.
25 posted on 07/20/2004 9:23:17 AM PDT by cricket (The starting point for Liberals is the lie. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
"Inquiring minds need to know."

Ditto. I've been trying to find someone who can provide a MOTIVE for what Berger did; determining a motive - and what that motive happens to be - will be the key to whether this story gets "legs."
26 posted on 07/20/2004 9:23:27 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

If the Millennium plot had been successful, clintbilly would have declared martial law; and he'd have been president for life.


27 posted on 07/20/2004 9:23:38 AM PDT by mombonn (¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Tim Russert: "Senator Kerry will you pardon Sandy Berger if you are elected in November?"

John Kerry:" Who's Sandy Berger?"


28 posted on 07/20/2004 9:23:49 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cricket
How do you inadvertently stuff classified documents down your pants and socks?
29 posted on 07/20/2004 9:24:41 AM PDT by rintense (Kerry/Edwards: Two Johns to screw America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: maica
"How does that impact Kerry?"

Ginsberg is an election law expert. Trust me, he knows exactly what the *essential* questions to ask are over this Sandy Berger deal, and who it is that must answer them.

30 posted on 07/20/2004 9:25:41 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
"I wonder if Kerry even knew if this investigation was going on. If he did he would have never put Berger on as an advisor.:"

Why is it, that this incident was not reported at the time; or at least immeidately prior to FBI doing it's 'file search' at Berger home.

Nothing else merits sacred secrecy from media. . .why this?

31 posted on 07/20/2004 9:26:30 AM PDT by cricket (The starting point for Liberals is the lie. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cricket

If the motive was to give ex-Clinton oficials a little better "spin" before the 9-11 Commission, I don't think this story will go very far; such a motive would only be played up by the press if the Bush administration did it. Then it would be big news. But if Berger were found to be acting on behalf of the Kerry campaign, I think it might be a different story. Then the press might go after it.


32 posted on 07/20/2004 9:27:09 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cricket

If Kerry is/was on the national security committee, and, these documents show that the Clinton Admin AND Kerry had advance warning of the attacks and did nothing... then BOTH Kerry and Clinton go down in flames.


33 posted on 07/20/2004 9:27:12 AM PDT by rintense (Kerry/Edwards: Two Johns to screw America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Sandy Berger, who is one of John Kerry's top advisors

Sandy Berger was CLINTON's national security advisor and this pops up just before the DNC convention.

Political Arkancide for Kerry aka clintoon

34 posted on 07/20/2004 9:28:59 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Flush the john/john rat ticket in 2004. #1 & #4 liberals in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
How do you inadvertently stuff classified documents down your pants and socks?

FIVE TIMES!??

35 posted on 07/20/2004 9:29:02 AM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
Ruth Vader...

Did not go unnoticed!

LOL!!

36 posted on 07/20/2004 9:29:09 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rintense

Wash post reporter was just on MSNBC , saying bloggers are spreading this "pants or socks" story. For crying out loud, it was in the AP story, of course we're talking about it. But she's acting like it's not true, something out of thin air in a 'partisan environment'.


37 posted on 07/20/2004 9:29:31 AM PDT by withteeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
Maybe a twisted "October surprise." Kerry can accuse the administration of not taking the strategy outlined in the classified documents (without revealing he's seen them) and make it look like it's the steps he would have taken to prevent 9/11.

Not likely. The Bush Admin never got the millennium plot docs, even though Clinton said he passed them on. Now, if Kerry suggests he would have taken steps to prevent 9-11 based on those documents, he admits to having prior knowledge- knowledge even the Bush Admin didn't have- thus, making him as culpable and responsible for 9-11 as Clinton.

38 posted on 07/20/2004 9:29:40 AM PDT by rintense (Kerry/Edwards: Two Johns to screw America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: teletech

Clearly Berger is hiding something, or has a sick and twisted fetish with classified documents and naked flesh.


39 posted on 07/20/2004 9:30:36 AM PDT by rintense (Kerry/Edwards: Two Johns to screw America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
How about the broad brush approach...

"Former CLINTON national security advisor and advisor to the 2004 Kerry Campaign, Sandy Berger...blah, blah, blah".

40 posted on 07/20/2004 9:31:00 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedy family legacy - can't skipper a boat, can't fly, can't drive, can't ski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cricket

I agree we need to put these guy's in jail for this stuff.
Never let these deeds go unpunished, make them pay the price.


41 posted on 07/20/2004 9:32:14 AM PDT by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

Rush called it Trousergate.


42 posted on 07/20/2004 9:32:41 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Rush said the docs contain info directly stating that AlQ were in the States in 1999.


43 posted on 07/20/2004 9:33:27 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Per Rush Limbaugh ... Kerry campaign just issues a Reno-era style "no comment during an ongoing investigation."


44 posted on 07/20/2004 9:34:53 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
The Penguin community has got to be embarrassed...


45 posted on 07/20/2004 9:34:56 AM PDT by ErnBatavia ("Dork"; a 60's term for a 60's kinda guy: JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
"Rush called it Trousergate"

If I were dictator, there would be a stiff fine for any journalist affixing the word "-gate" to the latest political scandal. It doesn't make any sense, and it isn't clever, but we seem to be stuck with it.
46 posted on 07/20/2004 9:35:39 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: teletech
How do you inadvertently stuff classified documents down your pants and socks?

FIVE TIMES!??

Same way Nicole and Ron inadvertently ran into OJ's knife several times.

47 posted on 07/20/2004 9:36:35 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedy family legacy - can't skipper a boat, can't fly, can't drive, can't ski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

BUMP for later...

Man, Rush is having a field day with this. Sandy Burglar? OMG!!!!

DimSpin: Nothing to see here...move on...Bush's fault...liar...

Let's see. Wilson? Liar. Burglar? Thief (ahem...allegedly)

If this story has legs, I want it shouted from the rooftops. Looks like the "Misunderestimated" poker player strikes again, without doing anything but telling the truth and acting with integrity. I guess that after 8 years of x42 and SWMNBN, the country never thought they could get integrity in the Oval Office again.

(SWMNBN = She Who Must Not Be Named)


48 posted on 07/20/2004 9:36:42 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (I approve this message: character and integrity matter. Bush/Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket; Matchett-PI

Believe it or not, I just saw two Senators, standing side by side, answer questions of the FNS anchor.

Sen Kit Bond (R) : IT's no big deal!!!!!

Sen Nelson, Fla (D): I appreciate what my colleageu just said!!!!

What is this ###?????


49 posted on 07/20/2004 9:37:42 AM PDT by maica (Hitlary says; "We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
"Rush said the docs contain info directly stating that AlQ were in the States in 1999."

If true, how do we counter the Dems, "So what? Everybody knew that."
50 posted on 07/20/2004 9:37:47 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson