Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest
NY TIMES EDITORIAL

Once again, the bumbling Bush administration would present us Lucy Van Pelt's football. In a dubious find, three fully functional nuclear weapons were discovered in Saddam Hussein's private bath.

Yet we are left to ask ourselves -- is a three a 'stockpile'? While nuclear weapons can be a little destructive, are they truly weapons of 'mass' destruction? And, if they haven't been used, don't they prove that Saddam was planning to peacefully acquire these weapons, but never use them?

In Abu Gharib, Iraqi prisoners were made to wear panties on their head. Who is the real terrorist here? George W. Bush!

(and on)

44 posted on 07/21/2004 6:03:23 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

LOL - you obviously got hold of an early edition. Sadly, it's probably close to the truth.


67 posted on 07/21/2004 6:08:42 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

If this report is confirmed, and that's a big "IF," how long do you suppose it'll be before the Dims start suggesting that these nukes are a "plant" by the Bush team?


69 posted on 07/21/2004 6:09:15 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Technical analysis will show the Iraqi designs to be duds, so Bush still lied. < / sarcasm>


73 posted on 07/21/2004 6:10:09 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson