To: tdadams
Hello, Cabin Boy. Did you know that the button is your friend? Well, maybe not yours, but anyway....
"Tell me where you draw the line at giving a layman's opinion about medical ethics because I find this desire of yours to silence dissent very curious."
In post #45 of this thread, Ed disagreed with you, and closed his disagreement by saying, " You are certainly entitled to your unqualified opinion, though."
Your reply to that post concluded with the first italicized paragraph above.
Explain how saying that you are entitled to your opinion indicates a desire to silence you.
To: tdadams
Hello, Cabin Boy. Did you know that the (To msg#) button is your friend? Well, maybe not yours, but anyway....
"Tell me where you draw the line at giving a layman's opinion about medical ethics because I find this desire of yours to silence dissent very curious."
In post #45 of this thread, Ed disagreed with you, and closed his disagreement by saying, "You are certainly entitled to your unqualified opinion, though."
Your reply to that post concluded with the first italicized paragraph above.
Explain how saying that you are entitled to your opinion indicates a desire to silence you.
To: Wampus SC
Did you miss the part of his post in #45 that I quoted, "I seriously doubt that you have the professional credentials to render criticism of any medical professional."?
It's dismissive and intended to nullify a perfectly valid point, a point he disagrees with and would like to castigate. And the analogies I made demonstrated very well that one need not have professional medical credentials to question the propriety of a doctor's conduct.
63 posted on
07/22/2004 10:33:18 AM PDT by
tdadams
(If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson