splain me why dems would leak this - you mean HRC & minions?
It's on another thread. It'll take a while to find the link. ON one of tonight's talk shows, a prominant dem (Kerry man) says Kerry was just informed this week by Berger, and Kerry told Berger to get the story out immediately.
>>splain me why dems would leak this - you mean HRC & minions?
<<
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1175918/posts?page=290#290
If the Democrats leak it now, it won't have the same kick as if it had been leaked on the eve of the election (as the Bush DUI story was). President Bush only missed the "popular vote" by 0.52%. Think he lost 500,000 votes?
We know that Clinton's legal team leaked information.
Why is it no one started Abu Ghraib stories with "this was already under investigation for months when it was leaked by one of the participants"?
Abu Ghraib was the turn around in public support for Iraq. It also kicked up the decapitations (kidnappings were already happening but they've picked up the pace).
Aid and comfort to the enemy so that the liberals could defeat "Mister" Bush.
As to the "election eve disclosure", HRC would have stood to gain with a Bush win. Bill Clinton DID know about this investigation. John Kerry must declare whether or not he was aware of this investigation. The press will not ask this question.