Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media Take Bryant Ruling to Supreme Court
Yahoo ^ | 07/22/2004 | Jon Sarche

Posted on 07/22/2004 11:40:27 AM PDT by Hawk44

DENVER - Media organizations have asked the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) to intervene in their fight to publicize details from closed-door hearings in the Kobe Bryant sexual assault case.

Attorneys for the media groups, which include The Associated Press, challenged a trial judge's ruling, which was upheld this week by the Colorado Supreme Court.

The groups on Wednesday asked the high court to stay that ruling. The filing was confirmed by an AP attorney, Dave Tomlin.

The media groups asked Justice Stephen Breyer (news - web sites) to put the ruling on hold pending a formal appeal of the state high court's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The First Amendment clash centers on transcripts from a two-day private hearing in June that were accidentally e-mailed to the media groups by a court reporter.

District Judge Terry Ruckriegle quickly issued an order threatening a contempt citation against any news organization that releases details from the hearing, which focused on attempts by Bryant's attorneys to have his accuser's sex life and money she received from a state victims' compensation program introduced as evidence. Those decisions are pending.

In a 4-3 ruling, the state's high court upheld Ruckriegle's order — though it acknowledged it amounts to prior restraint, which is barred by the Constitution. The court said such a step was permissible to protect the alleged victim's privacy rights and Bryant's right to a fair trial.

Prior restraint, the court added, "is necessary to protect against an evil that is great and certain and would result from reportage."

Attorneys for the media groups, however, said Ruckriegle's order "cannot withstand even the most cursory application of well-settled First Amendment principles."

If the order is not lifted, the media attorneys said, the media and public will "suffer continued and irreparable violation of their fundamental liberties guaranteed by the First Amendment."

Bryant, 25, is accused of raping a front desk worker at a Vail-area resort last summer. He has pleaded innocent to felony sexual assault, saying he had consensual sex with the woman, now 20.

If convicted, the Los Angeles Lakers star faces four years to life in prison or 20 years to life on probation, and a fine up to $750,000. His trial begins Aug. 27.

Besides the AP, organizations involved in the petition to the U.S. Supreme Court are The Denver Post, the Los Angeles Times, CBS, Fox News, ESPN and the television show "Celebrity Justice."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: court; firstammendment; media; nba; rape
Enquiring minds want to know.
1 posted on 07/22/2004 11:40:29 AM PDT by Hawk44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
the media and public will "suffer continued and irreparable violation of their fundamental liberties guaranteed by the First Amendment."

These are the same "media attorneys" who think a ban on private political advertising is just fine, right? Hypocrites, all of them. The "public" just wants to read dirty stories about the girl and Bryant, and the media just wants to sell.

2 posted on 07/22/2004 11:48:27 AM PDT by Tax-chick (It's possible that I look exactly like Catherine Zeta-Jones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
Enquiring minds want to know.

LOL, worse yet, they have the info and can't run with it, yet anyway.

That must drive the media whores nutz.

Seriesly nutz! LOL!

3 posted on 07/22/2004 11:50:59 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

This is just unbelievable - this isn't a freedom of the press issue - this is pure slime journalism.

Where are their ethics?

They are up in arms that the Berger issue was supposedly leaked, but they want to be able to print this, clearly NON PUBLIC, info........

I really am disgusted.
DKK


4 posted on 07/22/2004 12:52:10 PM PDT by LifeTrek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson