To: crz
I take issue with your notion. I don't believe anyone is really trying to fight the Civil War all over again. The battle being fought is essentially whether or not the South can honor it's heritage. Flags are being banned; in some areas Confederate fighters are not allowed to be recognized or honored, memorials are being protested, and there is the ongoing villification of all things southern. The current day fighting of the Civil War, if there that is what you call it, is primarily being done by those who want to banish any semblance of Confederate history.
16 posted on
07/23/2004 8:22:07 AM PDT by
CurlyBill
(We don't need a Gigolo and an Ambulance Chaser overseeing our Treasury!)
To: CurlyBill
Curly,
Unfortunately, there are actually two fights going on over the WBTS: One to preserve history (by such groups as the Sons of Confederate Veterans and the United Daughters of the Confederacy) and the other for white supremacy and/or secession now (by the League of the South, Conservative Citizens' Councils, etc.). The damnyankee liberal types are very good at tarring the efforts of the preservations with the brush of the white supremacists. That is certainly not fair and is not the intent of the preservationists, but the nutjob "neo-Confederates" play right into the stereotypes.
Deo Vindice!
19 posted on
07/23/2004 8:32:22 AM PDT by
RebelBanker
(Now I understand! "Allah" is Arabic for "Satan.")
To: CurlyBill
The whole "multiculturalism" argument is a sham. There were Irish, Scott, British, French, African, Caribbean, Cherokee, Seminole, Creek, and Jewish who served the Southern forces.
For educated professors, this is a shoddy article. Hummel's highly regarded work is head and shoulders above this piece.
22 posted on
07/23/2004 8:38:39 AM PDT by
stainlessbanner
(Never buy a saddle until you have met the horse)
To: CurlyBill
40 posted on
07/23/2004 11:42:15 AM PDT by
stand watie
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -T. Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson