To: Nathaniel Fischer
AOL shouldn't be prevented from banning guns on its property,I'm sorry, but I do not understand how the sensibilities of a company has trump card priviledges over matters specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
100 posted on
07/23/2004 8:21:32 PM PDT by
twntaipan
(demonRATs ARE the friends of our enemies, which makes demoRATs our... (finish the sentence).)
To: twntaipan
You have a right to keep and bare arms on your own property - not necessarily on someone else's property
186 posted on
07/24/2004 8:52:41 AM PDT by
reg45
To: twntaipan
Sorry but the protections in the Bill Of Rights only apply to governmental conduct. It doesn't prevent private companies or individuals from restricting them if they want. As Linda Ronstadt discovered this past week, there is no freedom of speech at the Aladdin - its not government censorship. Same with AOL barring employees from bringing a firearm to work - there is no government confiscation of guns issue involved here. Simple and straight. That's the way its always been in this country.
211 posted on
07/24/2004 11:33:26 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson