[Hank Rearden]

give him a strong Republican Congress, with more Republicans, so that in his 2nd term he really can have a better chance to implement a more conservative agenda

I see no indication Bush has in mind a more-conservative agenda, and I don't think I want to risk more of the liberal, free-spending, government-expanding, Constitution-assaulting crap he's inflicted on us in his first four years. Governmental gridlock is far preferable.

I look at Bush's record, and I'm not impressed. Killing terrorists is a function of the job, not the man, and is not optional. Virtually all of his other positions stink.

[FairOpinion]

I suppose Kerry's record, as the most liberal Senator impresses you and you prefer him to Bush? Because that's whom you are going to get, if Bush doesn't win.

And if you think Kerry would fight the War on Terror the same way Bush does it, you are no living in the real world.