Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

Clarence Thomas believes you can't rely on judicial precedence -- you have to go back to the founding document, in this case, the Constitution. If you rely on precedent, then one bad judicial action spawns many more -- like a game of telephone.

I don't see in the Constitution where the feds have authority over marriage. That means it belongs to the states.


27 posted on 07/25/2004 7:03:56 PM PDT by ellery (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: ellery
Have you considered the effects of the full faith and credit clause? States must give full faith and credit to their sister states' legal licenses. Do you honestly think if one state's judges, i.e. Massachusetts, impose gay marriage in that state, federal judges will not force the rest to comply?
31 posted on 07/25/2004 7:26:42 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson