To: jwalsh07
Clarence Thomas believes you can't rely on judicial precedence -- you have to go back to the founding document, in this case, the Constitution. If you rely on precedent, then one bad judicial action spawns many more -- like a game of telephone.
I don't see in the Constitution where the feds have authority over marriage. That means it belongs to the states.
27 posted on
07/25/2004 7:03:56 PM PDT by
ellery
(Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. - Ronald Reagan)
To: ellery
Have you considered the effects of the full faith and credit clause? States must give full faith and credit to their sister states' legal licenses. Do you honestly think if one state's judges, i.e. Massachusetts, impose gay marriage in that state, federal judges will not force the rest to comply?
31 posted on
07/25/2004 7:26:42 PM PDT by
asmith92008
(If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson