Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/28/2004 5:41:07 AM PDT by Area Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: Area Freeper

stem cell research is a major issue in people minds


2 posted on 07/28/2004 5:43:28 AM PDT by JohnthePatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

Nonsense, ka-ka, blither/blather, phooey blahblahblah. Nancy is still mourning the death of her husband. End of story.


3 posted on 07/28/2004 5:44:23 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

Nancy is an old lady racked with grief. Would she REALLY sacrifice babies so that her husband could have been saved from Alzheimer's?

Ron is still a teenager rebelling against his dad. Grow up, boy!


4 posted on 07/28/2004 5:45:06 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper
Ronald Reagan was a great American.

Nancy Reagan is a self-centered occultist weirdo.

Ron Reagan Jr. is a simpering, whimpering fairy.

The fact that Reagan could love both these jokers as much as he did proves that his heart was great and giving enough to also defend the unborn.

The tragedy of Ronald Reagan is that his vile family is striving to undo his legacy.

5 posted on 07/28/2004 5:45:42 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

Nancy Reagan is still in mourning and I can't blame her for not wanting to get into the political fray this year. As far as I know she still supports President Bush though and I don't think her lack of appearance at the GOP convention will hurt Bush that much. I do hope Michael Reagan has an opportunity to speak in rememberance of his father though. As for Ron Reagan, he is just a spoiled brat, who clearly has never really grown up.


6 posted on 07/28/2004 5:46:25 AM PDT by miloklancy (The biggest problem with the Democrats is that they are in office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

But Bush was going to gain so many votes by pandering to liberals and signing the Stem Cell Research legislation that angered so many of those pesky, embarassing, ultra-conservatives Rove told to get out of the "New Big Tent".

Gee, talk about your liberal ingrates.


7 posted on 07/28/2004 5:47:35 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

Leave her alone. She doesn't need the likes of MM bashing her and Reagan right now.


12 posted on 07/28/2004 5:50:18 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper
To hell with them, then.

The CONSERVATIVE, PATRIOT movement moves on, with or without them.

It isn't wrapped around anyone person, either.

Don't let the door hit you on the arse on the way out, is all I can say.

Let's move forward. We can win without them anyway.

13 posted on 07/28/2004 5:50:32 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (***Since The Iraq War & Transition Period Began, NORTH KOREA HAS MANUFACTURED (8) NUCLEAR WEAPONS***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper
Ronald Reagan was a great American.

Nancy Reagan is a self-centered occultist weirdo.

Ronald Reagan Jr. is a simpering, whimpering fairy.

The fact that President reagan was great-souled enough to love and care for these two jokers proves that he was great-souled enough to defend the unborn from murder.

The tragedy of President Reagan is that his nearest and dearest, out of their lust for self-promotion, are trying to destroy his legacy.

14 posted on 07/28/2004 5:50:43 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper
Ron should stick to fluttering about on his tip toes.
16 posted on 07/28/2004 5:53:35 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

Oh, fine. I'll say it.

It strikes me as ungrateful and small of Nancy not even as much as to film a brief thank you, at very least, to the party which loved and loves her husband, and which poured out its heart to her in her grief.

Instead, by her silence, and given her son's treachery, she de fact enables those who most hated and hate her husband and everything he stood for.

Given Nancy's failure, Michael Reagan should speak.

Dan


17 posted on 07/28/2004 5:54:13 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

Ron Reagan has had his one and only fifteen minutes of fame. Nancy Reagan has had her day! The truth is both these folks don't matter one iota to the outcome of this year's Presidential election. After the election, Ron Reagan will disappear into the black hole of obscurity. He played his card and now he is of no use whatsoever to the Democrat Party or MSNBC.


18 posted on 07/28/2004 5:54:45 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper
My impression is that stem cell research is far from a major issue, certainly not one which will decide this election.

Stem cell research is not even on the radar screen of most votors. The few that do have strong feeling one way or the other are still not likely to change their vote because of it. The issues that will shift votes this year will be Terrorism, War in Iraq, and the economy. This just isn't a "social issue" election year. No major social issue is really on the radar screen, How much talking have you heard either candidate do about gun control, abortion etc. The only social issue I can think of that is even remotely on the radar screen is gay marriage and that heavily favors Bush.

20 posted on 07/28/2004 5:56:31 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper
Much as we would like to, I don't believe President Reagan's conservatism can be projected onto Nancy.

I'm of the opinion she's always been a closet liberal.....keeping her ideology under wraps because of her adoration for her husband.

It's my fervent hope that Nancy continues gracefully on the American scene without teaming up with her idiot son in some of his weird leftist causes.

Leni

22 posted on 07/28/2004 6:01:27 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

The story tells it like the Bush campaign worked hard to get her to show and was rebuffed. I would be willing to bet that they actually had enough class to know that she was still in mourning, that she would not want to be a counterpoint to Ron Jr., give the impression of gutter fighting in the family, and that she believes that stem cell research is the way to go which runs counter to the President. The combination makes it an awkward situation. I would bet that the Bushies offered her the opportunity and didn't put any expectations or pressure on it.


23 posted on 07/28/2004 6:03:12 AM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

How about the only "real" Reagan still alive -Michael?


26 posted on 07/28/2004 6:04:12 AM PDT by MrLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

Obviously Nancy doesn't believe that Kerry is as dangerous as we do.

Why would she sit on the sidelines when a brief show of support is all that's being asked? I know she's in mourning, but your country calls on you both when it's convenient and when it's not.


33 posted on 07/28/2004 6:11:10 AM PDT by horatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper

Seems that Nancy and Ron have gotten so hung up on embryonic stem cells that they have forgotten there are two other sources of stem cells. Too bad they prefer to kill human beings to get stem cells than to use cells from umbilical cord blood or bone marrow.


36 posted on 07/28/2004 6:13:18 AM PDT by MEGoody (Kerry - isn't that a girl's name? (Conan O'Brian))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper
In an impassioned defense of stem-cell research,

I saw the speech. It didn't strike me as impassioned. Ultra condescending, yes. Impassioned, no.

38 posted on 07/28/2004 6:16:06 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Area Freeper
A downcast senior GOP official confirmed Nancy Reagan had never committed to appearing at the convention, but was nevertheless dubious of the official explanation.

"The 'not feeling up to it' line is bull----," the official said. "Something happened in the last month, and whatever it was was real."

What an @$$!
I don't care what stripe he wears, this guy's a certified, grade 'A', #1 Choice-Cut @$$hole.

47 posted on 07/28/2004 6:23:09 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson