Skip to comments.
Earth-like planets may be more rare than thought
Nature Magazine ^
| 30 July 2004
| Philip Ball
Posted on 07/30/2004 11:12:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-180 next last
To: The KG9 Kid; ASA Vet
*sigh* make that 4 posts...
61
posted on
07/30/2004 12:41:25 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Freedom is written with blood on the streets, not with ink in congress.)
Comment #62 Removed by Moderator
To: Rock N Jones
I'm asking you. I have a reason for wanting YOUR answer.
63
posted on
07/30/2004 12:42:22 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Freedom is written with blood on the streets, not with ink in congress.)
To: Bikers4Bush
You just blew my mind again, brother! If you are ever in Las Vegas call me, I'll buy you a ginger ale and you can share more! ;-)
64
posted on
07/30/2004 12:42:53 PM PDT
by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: TruthInExile
No need to spend all that research money. All they had to do is read the Bible.
What is really scary about this statement is that I know that you weren't being sarcastic.
65
posted on
07/30/2004 12:44:12 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
To: Presidente1
However, it means we'll likely never ever contact one.Probably just as well. I don't look forward to playing explorers and natives, with us cast as the natives...
66
posted on
07/30/2004 12:44:15 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Freedom is written with blood on the streets, not with ink in congress.)
To: RUCKUS INC.
Big News, the longer we study the Universe the more it invariably points to a Creator who designed this little "happenstance" called Earth.
It does?
67
posted on
07/30/2004 12:44:52 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
To: ZULU
Moreover, I think that we can only find Jupiter-sized planets if they're orbiting really, really close to the star. Since we don't have any gaseous planets next to the Sun, it stands to reason that the only planets we can find right now are the onest that have been formed in a different way. Bottom line: we simply don't have the technology to detect planets like any planet in our Solar System.
68
posted on
07/30/2004 12:46:58 PM PDT
by
Nataku X
(You hear all the time, "Be more like Jesus." But have you ever heard, "Be more like Muhammed"?)
To: RadioAstronomer
Most of them are, however, much closer to their sun than Jupiter is to ours: they are known as 'hot Jupiters'.
Can you say "selection effect?"
Obviously, large, close planets gravitationally interact more with the parent star than do large, distant planets or small planets at any distance. Thus, our extrasolar planet-detecting systems will preferentially detect the type of planets that the study then cites as the basis on which to conclude that earth-like planets must be rare.
To: null and void
IIRC, they have a common ancestor Tümuch Beer... ...who is constantly being followed around by his little brother Holdmüh Beer.
70
posted on
07/30/2004 12:49:25 PM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(May the wings of Liberty never lose so much as a feather.)
To: Rock N Jones
The more I read lines of scripture, the more I am convinced that the people who wrote this stuff were doing some pretty drugs.
To: Dimensio
Yes, it does. What is your best explanation for the fact that the more we learn the more complex everything becomes?
72
posted on
07/30/2004 12:51:25 PM PDT
by
RUCKUS INC.
("Wow, what a crapweasel." - Frank_Discussion)
To: ZULU
There is also the "moon factor" which impacts the earths tilt and also provides other benefits of which I can't recall.The tilt effect is the moderation of swings in axis inclination -- makes for a stable, benign climate. Also, a big moon creates tides, allowing marine life to emerge onto dry land.
Problem is that our Moon is a freak, created during a giant planetary-scale collision 4.5 billion years ago. Although it can happen (clearly), it's not a likely event.
73
posted on
07/30/2004 12:54:33 PM PDT
by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
To: RUCKUS INC.
Ummmm, If the ultimate answer is "God did it" shouldn't everything get simpler the more we learn???
74
posted on
07/30/2004 12:55:21 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Freedom is written with blood on the streets, not with ink in congress.)
To: RUCKUS INC.
What is your best explanation for the fact that the more we learn the more complex everything becomes?Everything about becomes more complex precisely because we have learned more about it. It's question of epistemology, not ontology. Your argument that complexity means that there must be a designer is reminiscent of liberals claiming that complexity necessitates a head-in-the-sand approach to everything.
75
posted on
07/30/2004 12:59:44 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>stupid blob</A>)
To: RUCKUS INC.
What is your best explanation for the fact that the more we learn the more complex everything becomes?Everything about the universe becomes more complex precisely because we have learned more about it. It's question of epistemology, not ontology. Your argument that complexity means that there must be a designer is reminiscent of liberals claiming that complexity necessitates a head-in-the-sand approach to everything.
76
posted on
07/30/2004 1:00:12 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>stupid blob</A>)
To: Junior
Actually only slightly so, except for Pluto. Mars is quite high too. In the table linked here, "Orbital Eccentricity" is the line to look at. The "Ellipticity - Flattening" refers to the non-sphericalness of the planet itself (Saturn stands out here due to high rotation and low density)
http://home.cwru.edu/~sjr16/advanced/planets_main.html
77
posted on
07/30/2004 1:04:15 PM PDT
by
alnitak
("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
To: RUCKUS INC.
What is your best explanation for the fact that the more we learn the more complex everything becomes?
The more we learn, the more information we have about how the world works, so naturally we have to come up with more and more complex explanations for it all.
I don't see how that relates to a "Creator".
79
posted on
07/30/2004 1:08:36 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
To: null and void
Aw, what did I do? C'mon, I'm a scientist.
80
posted on
07/30/2004 1:08:47 PM PDT
by
The KG9 Kid
(Semper Fi)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-180 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson