Skip to comments.
NEWSPAPER CLAIMS MOORE DOCTORED FRONT PAGE! (MOORE CAUGHT IN LIE!)
WINS ^
| 8/1/04
Posted on 08/01/2004 1:07:16 PM PDT by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: sinanju
Not to mention the family of the serviceman who's funeral he used... or the documentary maker he pilfered footage from.
To: TomServo
Uh - make that ' Therefore avoiding the standard, 'Already Poste
d Here™'
Fat fingers - untie!!
22
posted on
08/01/2004 1:25:54 PM PDT
by
TomServo
("I'm so upset that I'll binge on a Saltine.")
To: TomServo
I think the reason for the $1 damages claim is that you have to sue for sum amount of cash, and the amount shows they are only interested in the principle of the matter, not economic gain.
23
posted on
08/01/2004 1:37:45 PM PDT
by
swilhelm73
(We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France. -Duke Wellington)
To: swilhelm73
I would've sued his lard-ass for everything I could. But that's just me.
24
posted on
08/01/2004 1:39:56 PM PDT
by
TomServo
("I'm so upset that I'll binge on a Saltine.")
To: areafiftyone
The paper is seeking $1 in damages. Wow. The lawyers must be tripping over themselves to take this case.
To: areafiftyone
Liar, liar, pants on fire!
26
posted on
08/01/2004 1:41:27 PM PDT
by
DoctorMichael
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: areafiftyone
AP version of Moore's epic
"Pantagraph -- 1 dollar" is now appearing on Newsday's website, in the
Entertainment section.LOL. We were supposed to take Moore's award winning political statement,
"Fahrenheit 911"
seriously, but criticism of its truthfulness is discussed in the Entertainment section.
Another (hardcopy) Newsday headline, today, was...
Kerry sets sites [sic] on swing vote.
Do they mean websites, building sites, or camping sites?
They certainly didn't write "sights," as in gunsights. Perhaps, Newsday was pressured by the anti-gun folks or the anti-war folks.
27
posted on
08/01/2004 1:44:03 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Daschle on National Missile Defense debate -- "THIS ISN'T ROCKET SCIENCE." June 8, 2001)
To: syriacus
If this paper would hire John Edwards, on contingency of course, they could hit this slim ball for about $50 mil.
28
posted on
08/01/2004 1:57:22 PM PDT
by
nadlo
To: nadlo
If this paper would hire John Edwards, on contingency of course, they could hit this slim ball for about $50 milLOL.
29
posted on
08/01/2004 2:00:20 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Daschle on National Missile Defense debate -- "THIS ISN'T ROCKET SCIENCE." June 8, 2001)
To: areafiftyone
"Socialist Realism" doesn't have to be real. "Revolutionary Truth" doesn't have to be true.
To: Mia T
31
posted on
08/01/2004 2:03:37 PM PDT
by
jla
(http://www.ronaldreaganmemorial.com/memorial_fund.asp)
To: jla
32
posted on
08/01/2004 2:11:20 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: jocon307
One dollar? Why not $20 Million?
Because they think the REALLY good ambulance chasers will be in federal public office by the time this comes to trial. And they don't disagree with the general tone of the "film" anyway.
33
posted on
08/01/2004 2:13:46 PM PDT
by
Watery Tart
(as herself, a "strainge wuhmmuhn taken wit' lyin' in ponds distributin' swords...".)
To: areafiftyone
Not one. Not the single slightest trivial detail of this movie is untainted.
34
posted on
08/01/2004 2:39:52 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(They hang traitors don't they?)
To: Leo Carpathian
They want the public apology and not an expensive suit that could cause them to shed jobs.
An apology would just about kill Moore since when he does do so, all will use it in his face as undeniable proof of his scummy film editing.
35
posted on
08/01/2004 2:54:37 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: surelyclintonsbaddream
36
posted on
08/01/2004 2:57:39 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Kerry/Edwards: More Affordable Hair Care for America)
You folks know what this sounds like to me?
It sounds like the paper -who sure seems to not be upset about MOO's deceptions or movie- is attempting to get more people to notice and possibly go and see F911.
It sounds like MOO's buddies are trying to help him with this.
37
posted on
08/01/2004 3:02:33 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism)
To: areafiftyone
What is this "Newspaper Claims" garbage? Either Moore doctored the front page or he didn't. Can't reporters ever just report facts anymore. It should be easy enough for the reporter to check this one out.
38
posted on
08/01/2004 3:02:56 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
(Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
To: areafiftyone
People like this will do anything in the name of revolution. Arrest, convict, and then hang this traitor.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson