Posted on 08/01/2004 1:07:16 PM PDT by areafiftyone
BLOOMINGTON, Ill. (AP) -- Filmmaker Michael Moore's Bush-basing documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" has apparently upset more than Republicans. The Pantagraph newspaper in Bloomington said Friday it sent a letter to Moore and the film's distributor, Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., asking for an apology for using what it said was a doctored front page in his movie.
The paper is seeking $1 in damages.
A scene early in the movie shows newspaper headlines related to the contested 2000 presidential election. It includes a shot of The Pantagraph's Dec. 19, 2001, front page, with the prominent headline, "Latest Florida recount shows Gore won election."
The newspaper says that headline never appeared on that day.
The paper said the headline appeared in a Dec. 5, 2001, edition but was not used on the front page. Instead, it was found in much smaller type above a letter to the editor, which the paper says reflects "only the opinions of the letter writer."
"If (Moore) wants to 'edit' The Pantagraph, he should apply for a copy-editing job," the paper said.
Neither Lions Gate nor Moore were immediately available for comment Sunday.
Such a shock, eh? I may never recover from this knowledge.
Whoa-a-a-a!!
"The paper is seeking $1 in damages"
One dollar? Why not $20 Million? I mean, to ask for token damages is all very sporting, but that fat pig won't learn nothing unless he is hit in the pocketbook, hard. It's the American way, after all.
*Yawn*
Rats will deny it... They'll claim the paper is making the whole thing up... They're too ignorant to read this stuff and discern the real truth about that FAT SLOB SOCIALIST LIAR.
http://www.pantagraph.com/stories/073004/new_20040730034.shtml
Friday, July 30, 2004
Pantagraph to Moore: Headline use 'misleading'
Explanation, apology sought
By Bill Flick
flick@pantagraph.com
Advertisement
BLOOMINGTON -- The Pantagraph has a message for Michael Moore, creator of the movie hit, "Fahrenheit 9/11":
If he wants to "edit" The Pantagraph, he should apply for a copy-editing job and not simply show made-over and "falsely represented" pages from the newspaper in his movie -- or he should at least ask for permission first.
In a letter drafted Thursday and sent to Moore and the movie's Santa Monica, Calif.-based distributor, Lions Gate Entertainment, the newspaper admonished him for his "unauthorized ... misleading" use of The Pantagraph in the film. He also was cited for copyright infringement.
The letter, drafted by J. Casey Costigan of the Bloomington law firm, Costigan & Wollrab, seeks an apology, an explanation of how such a strange discrepancy occurred in his movie and compensatory damages -- of $1.
"While we are highly flattered to be included in the movie," said Pantagraph President and Publisher Henry Bird, "we are a bit disturbed that our pages were misrepresented."
Previous attempts to reach Moore through Lions Gate by phone and e-mail were unsuccessful.
In the film, Moore criticizes President Bush's handling of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the president's and his associates' ties to Saudi Arabian oil interests.
In a moment early in the movie, newspaper headlines from around America that relate to the legally contested 2000 presidential election flash across the screen. One of them is purported to be from a Dec. 19, 2001, edition of The Pantagraph.
But a check of that day's newspaper revealed the large headline prominently flashed in the movie -- "Latest Florida recount shows Gore won election" -- never appeared in that edition.
Instead, the headline appeared in a Dec. 5, 2001, edition -- but not as a news headline. It was in much smaller type above a letter to the editor. Those headlines reflect only the opinions of the letter writer and are not considered "factual" news stories.
In the movie, The Pantagraph page, as shown, was not how a real page from the newspaper would have looked. Moore's version had a different typeface and a different headline size from what The Pantagraph uses. The newspaper's name, however, appears in the correct font.
The letter calls all of this a "misrepresentation of facts."
The discrepancy first came to light in a July 16 Bill Flick column.
Since then it has become a topic of newspaper articles, radio talk shows and various Web sites.
"In an instance that The Pantagraph prints materials in which there is a mistake," the Costigan letter to Moore reads, "it is corrected. It is our hope that you would adhere to the same high ethical standard and correct the inaccurate information which has been depicted in your film."
The letter calls into question the ethics of how Moore made his movie, a movie whose primary purpose is to call into question the ethics of the Bush White House.
The should add seven zeroes to that $1 and sue the fat Mooron.
I know - it seems silly to me.
Continuing logically, I assume Moore had to "doctor" a front page to say that "Gore won", because he couldn't find a genuine front page saying that.
In truth, when all the counting was done by sundry and all, the headlines all said "Bush won". So Moore had to make one up.
So, that's how a professional does it. :-)
Moore's version had a different typeface and a different headline size from what The Pantagraph uses.
The newspaper's name, however, appears in the correct font.
http://216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:a6PLnTnYldwJ:www.pantagraph.com/+Pantagraph+moore&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
Moore, wouldn't do that....
Well, that answers that question!
Wow :) I love it when a plan comes together *snicker*
nah,,, I like the $1. It makes it much more difficult for the Dim's to say it is a republican paper....... This way, they either get news or an apology, both work.....
It is going to be interesting to see just how averse MM is to actually admitting wrongdoing and apologize? Has there been any further word on the two wounded Iraq veterans, footage of whom was included in the movie without their knowledge or consent?
And people believe everything he puts in his movies....
Is it news created by net generated activism? I saw this story start over at Moorewatch.com. :o)
Well, while it was a dupe - they were under different headlines. Therefore avoiding the standard, 'Already Poster Here™'
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.