To: VadeRetro
Handwaves and simple objections. No. You haven't presented anything that would pass for evidence in a court of law. That isn't an objection, that is contempt of court on your part. Present viable evidence that supports your claim or sit down and rest your case. I for one am all for defunding you. This illusion has gone on long enough.
134 posted on
08/03/2004 10:23:35 AM PDT by
Havoc
(.)
To: Havoc
That isn't an objection, that is contempt of court on your part.Let me ask you a question, and please answer as honestly as possible:
What piece of evidence, if found, would you consider convincing (concerning evolutionary theory)?
137 posted on
08/03/2004 10:29:23 AM PDT by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Havoc
You haven't presented anything that would pass for evidence in a court of law. That isn't an objection, that is contempt of court on your part. Try not to speak about things you have no experience in. The evidence on transitionals on this thread would qualify as evidence in a court of law. You, however, still haven't come up with any counter-argument other than "Does not!"
Present viable evidence that supports your claim or sit down and rest your case.
He has. And you have not supplied any rebuttals.
149 posted on
08/03/2004 10:58:00 AM PDT by
Modernman
("I have nothing to declare except my genius." -Oscar Wilde)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson