Since I agree with the president on everything you seem to be 'mad at' and disagree on things you'd probably fight to the death to defend: I don't see much coming from any discussion.
I might suggest using words like "church", "Jesus", and "divine" a bit less in your titles - might be showing a bias there.
And, in summary:
9/11, bad
Iraq 2, good but not as good as it might be
John Kerry, contempt, which I understand goes both ways
An American president willing to take action when the world knitting society chose not to do so - priceless.
PS: you might do better by setting out a topic, omitting the words "divine", Etc.
Since I agree with the president on everything you seem to be 'mad at' and disagree on things you'd probably fight to the death to defend: I don't see much coming from any discussion.
I might suggest using words like "church", "Jesus", and "divine" a bit less in your titles - might be showing a bias there.
And, in summary:
9/11, bad
Iraq 2, good but not as good as it might be
John Kerry, contempt, which I understand goes both ways
An American president willing to take action when the world knitting society chose not to do so - priceless.
PS: you might do better by setting out a topic, omitting the words "divine", Etc.
----
Norton, those who have followed my threads here know that i often find the titles the Voice gives my articles, which I have no control over, idiotic.