Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: atomicpossum
At least some percentage of women are simply unable to breastfeed, work or no.

And the reason for this is. . . ?

8 posted on 08/06/2004 4:50:11 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: toddst
At least some percentage of women are simply unable to breastfeed, work or no.

And the reason for this is. . . ?

My wife was unable to produce adequately to feed our twins. Since they were hospitalized for 12 weeks due to prematurity, we thought the decreased production may have been due to being forced to use a breastpump. We thought that if the boys were able to suckle directly, it might improve. Unfortunately, our next child proved this not to be the case. Even with the singleton, she was unable to produce a significant amount beyond the first week or so, once his demands started to increase.

9 posted on 08/06/2004 5:01:33 AM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: toddst

My mom was unable. Sometimes it's not about making a choice but rather a physical inability to produce milk.


21 posted on 08/06/2004 5:53:14 AM PDT by cjshapi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: toddst

Breast milk production is a result of the action of certain hormones within the body, particularly prolactin. If the mother's hormone levels are not sufficient to milk production, then she will not be able to breast feed. It is possible for a woman to be unable to breast feed, regardless of her intention.


22 posted on 08/06/2004 7:01:14 AM PDT by AQGeiger (Have you hugged your soldier today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson