"2. The Hebrews of the Bible were Arabs."
If he means semitics then he is correct
Semites, yes. Southwestern nomads, like the Arabs, no.
"3. The Prophets of the Bible were Muslims."
Slammies believe that the prophets were all slammies
Supercession theologies are not pretty.
"5. Solomons Temple was not built by Israelites but by Arab Canaanites."
Canaanites were not Arabs.
If you believe the Bible and the Koran, this is untrue since the Canaanites where destroyed by then.
If you go by linguistics, Ancient Hebrew is a Canaanite laguage, similar to Phonecian, and Ugaritic. However, it had Northwester Semitic influences, even before Aramaic became the lingua-franca of the region.
However, the Arabs were Southwestern Semites.
"6. The Canaanites are the forefathers of the Palestinians"
Maybe, to some extent
Not historically.
"9. The location of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is a Zionist invention."
The lies these slammies tell and believe!
No, both the Torah and Koran place it on Mt. Moriah.
huh? Both Arabs and Jews are semitics, how can there be racism if they both belong to the same race?
It is tribalist.
Actually, what is wrong with the fairly obvious proposition that the Biblical Edomites and Midianites (Midianite, after all, was a generic term for all Bedouins) were the ancestors of today's Palestinians ?