[Living Stone]

So you call it anarchy when people do not suffer from the coercive powers of the state for the reasons of control and revenue gathering?

I stand by original assertation, that driving is indeed a right. The simple fact of the matter is that I believe in the maximum possible freedom for the individual as long as there is no damage done to anyone else, and you do not.

Did you not notice the problems that developed from unbridled government during the 20th century? What, in your opinion, does the state NOT have the power to do?

Blatant disrespect for the law by government because it does not agree with thier statist agenda is the way to tyranny. We are far down that road. Some of us wish to change directions.

You will never convince me to abandon the principles of Freedom and Liberty in a thousand years, should you live so long, so you may as well save your breath.

I will not bow to the state as a god.

[robertpaulsen]

"So you call it anarchy when people do not suffer from the coercive powers of the state for the reasons of control and revenue gathering?"

I call it anarchy when people insist that state governments have no constitutional right to regulate who sits behind the wheel of a 3000 pound car or 20,000 pound truck and drive 70 mph on public highways.