Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russert Held in Contempt in CIA Leak Case
AP ^ | August 9, 2004 10:16 PM | CURT ANDERSON

Posted on 08/09/2004 2:40:43 PM PDT by Former Military Chick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Former Military Chick; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog; Mudboy Slim
"Meet the Press" host Tim Russert were required to testify "regarding alleged conversations they had with a specified executive branch official."

One day behind bars with cell mate Bubba, and Russert will be singing like the Birdman...

41 posted on 08/09/2004 3:29:23 PM PDT by Libloather (What did Bergler stow - and when did he stow it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

42 posted on 08/09/2004 3:30:03 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"shopped" to 6 different reporters

Russert....Cooper........Novak....who are the other three reporters?

43 posted on 08/09/2004 3:31:57 PM PDT by Dog (Edwards threatening Al Qaeda is like Pee Wee Herman threatening Lucca Brazzi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Andrea Mitchell was another.

The problem with Joe's assertion is when he speaks he is clearly (well, clearly to those who see how he frames his accusation and the context which points to a certain timeframe) referring to media contacts with the administration AFTER the Novak article appeared.

Ah, Brit reporting the Cooper contempt cite right now.


44 posted on 08/09/2004 3:37:21 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Oh--and the other two reporters were with Newsday, I believe.


45 posted on 08/09/2004 3:37:52 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

A face only a terrorist could love??


46 posted on 08/09/2004 3:41:09 PM PDT by Former Military Chick (I previously posted under Military Chick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
I think they should absolutely have to reveal their sources.

Yes I agree they like to envoke their shield deal as a member of the press. I just wonder who decides that wont take court time. I do think this will be a hit to russert. He TRIES to be the middle ground, this little scandal might humble him.

47 posted on 08/09/2004 3:43:36 PM PDT by Former Military Chick (I previously posted under Military Chick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

Bingo...

For the first time, this whole thing is starting to make sense. Joe Wilson et al planned this whole thing and got the typical DEM "goon" squad of reporters and Clintonistas to supposedly out Mrs. Wilson -- and then blame it on the Republicans.

Now the truth is coming out. I'm expecting to see some RATs do time in federal prison with their cell mate being Sandy Berger.


48 posted on 08/09/2004 3:49:19 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
This will be interesting. Now these liberal democrat activist judges are going after the first amendment and the liberal media doesn't like it.

I wonder if they will ever learn?
49 posted on 08/09/2004 4:42:06 PM PDT by chainsaw (VOTE AMERICAN - VOTE REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

With that image, you could confuse the daylights out of the next newbie that asks "what's a ping"!


50 posted on 08/09/2004 4:46:57 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I actually was going to throw like a man before I threw like a girl." JFK 7/25/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

YUP.


51 posted on 08/09/2004 4:48:25 PM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Time and Cooper, however, did not agree to be interviewed and intend to appeal the judge's ruling, said Managing Editor Jim Kelly. If Time loses those appeals, Cooper could be jailed under Hogan's order until he agrees to appear and the magazine could be fined $1,000 a day.

Can't we assume that Cooper is not risking jail and the magazine a heavy fine in order to protect a Bush loyalist?

Would they risk it, though, for, say, Richard Clarke...???

52 posted on 08/09/2004 6:07:54 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Right on. If it were a republican who leaked it they would not be fighting against testifying. They must be protecting a fellow lib.


53 posted on 08/09/2004 7:45:03 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage (Kerry is a threat to national security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Southack
"Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this," Novak said on "Crossfire." "There is no great crime here."


Apparently it is a crime to identify CIA operatives. If no one from the White House told Novak, then I guess it will be Novak that is convicted.
54 posted on 08/10/2004 8:35:04 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick; Admin Moderator

Russert has not been held in contempt. This title is wrong.


55 posted on 08/10/2004 8:43:49 AM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
"That scumbag Cooper would have sung like a canary by now if there was anything damaging to Bush or Cheney to be told."

So why doesn't Novak just write a column detailing how he came across the information if it was a sting operation and the administration has nothing to hide?
56 posted on 08/10/2004 8:44:38 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

What would ole Red think.


57 posted on 08/10/2004 8:45:57 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

So who'll be interviewing Tater Russett on "Beat the Mess"?


58 posted on 08/10/2004 8:49:13 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monday
So why doesn't Novak just write a column detailing how he came across the information if it was a sting operation and the administration has nothing to hide?

Why should he? Note that Novak hasn't been cited for contempt by any court. He can sit back, reputation intact, and laugh as this whole thing plays out. And it WILL play out, one way or the other.

Funny how the Democrat operative, Cooper, is the one who is really on the hot seat, no? Russert is a sideshow, and he has not been cited for contempt since he is "cooperating".

I think Cooper is taking his marching orders from the other Democrat operative, his wife. Maybe Mandy is tired of the guy and sees this as a handy way to get rid of him, lol.

59 posted on 08/10/2004 10:05:52 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane; Admin Moderator

We addressed that long agon in this thread.

Sadly this will not be the first AP aricle that changes the merits by only changing the title.

Yet, having discussed the way it was titled those on the thread got a lot out of the behavior of the AP. Most are pretty bright to catch this. At least that is how I see it.

Thank you for your concern.


60 posted on 08/10/2004 3:54:45 PM PDT by Former Military Chick (I previously posted under Military Chick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson