Skip to comments.
Russert Held in Contempt in CIA Leak Case
AP ^
| August 9, 2004 10:16 PM
| CURT ANDERSON
Posted on 08/09/2004 2:40:43 PM PDT by Former Military Chick
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: Former Military Chick; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog; Mudboy Slim
"Meet the Press" host Tim Russert were required to testify "regarding alleged conversations they had with a specified executive branch official."One day behind bars with cell mate Bubba, and Russert will be singing like the Birdman...
41
posted on
08/09/2004 3:29:23 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(What did Bergler stow - and when did he stow it?)
To: Former Military Chick
42
posted on
08/09/2004 3:30:03 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: cyncooper
"shopped" to 6 different reporters Russert....Cooper........Novak....who are the other three reporters?
43
posted on
08/09/2004 3:31:57 PM PDT
by
Dog
(Edwards threatening Al Qaeda is like Pee Wee Herman threatening Lucca Brazzi.)
To: Dog
Andrea Mitchell was another.
The problem with Joe's assertion is when he speaks he is clearly (well, clearly to those who see how he frames his accusation and the context which points to a certain timeframe) referring to media contacts with the administration AFTER the Novak article appeared.
Ah, Brit reporting the Cooper contempt cite right now.
44
posted on
08/09/2004 3:37:21 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
To: Dog
Oh--and the other two reporters were with Newsday, I believe.
45
posted on
08/09/2004 3:37:52 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
To: Revolting cat!
A face only a terrorist could love??
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
I think they should absolutely have to reveal their sources. Yes I agree they like to envoke their shield deal as a member of the press. I just wonder who decides that wont take court time. I do think this will be a hit to russert. He TRIES to be the middle ground, this little scandal might humble him.
To: Ron in Acreage
Bingo...
For the first time, this whole thing is starting to make sense. Joe Wilson et al planned this whole thing and got the typical DEM "goon" squad of reporters and Clintonistas to supposedly out Mrs. Wilson -- and then blame it on the Republicans.
Now the truth is coming out. I'm expecting to see some RATs do time in federal prison with their cell mate being Sandy Berger.
To: Former Military Chick
This will be interesting. Now these liberal democrat activist judges are going after the first amendment and the liberal media doesn't like it.
I wonder if they will ever learn?
49
posted on
08/09/2004 4:42:06 PM PDT
by
chainsaw
(VOTE AMERICAN - VOTE REPUBLICAN)
To: Howlin
With that image, you could confuse the daylights out of the next newbie that asks "what's a ping"!
50
posted on
08/09/2004 4:46:57 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("I actually was going to throw like a man before I threw like a girl." JFK 7/25/2004)
To: NonValueAdded
51
posted on
08/09/2004 4:48:25 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(Saving Private Hamster)
To: Former Military Chick
Time and Cooper, however, did not agree to be interviewed and intend to appeal the judge's ruling, said Managing Editor Jim Kelly. If Time loses those appeals, Cooper could be jailed under Hogan's order until he agrees to appear and the magazine could be fined $1,000 a day. Can't we assume that Cooper is not risking jail and the magazine a heavy fine in order to protect a Bush loyalist?
Would they risk it, though, for, say, Richard Clarke...???
52
posted on
08/09/2004 6:07:54 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: okie01
Right on. If it were a republican who leaked it they would not be fighting against testifying. They must be protecting a fellow lib.
53
posted on
08/09/2004 7:45:03 PM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(Kerry is a threat to national security)
To: Southack
"Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this," Novak said on "Crossfire." "There is no great crime here."
Apparently it is a crime to identify CIA operatives. If no one from the White House told Novak, then I guess it will be Novak that is convicted.
54
posted on
08/10/2004 8:35:04 AM PDT
by
monday
To: Former Military Chick; Admin Moderator
Russert has not been held in contempt. This title is wrong.
55
posted on
08/10/2004 8:43:49 AM PDT
by
sissyjane
(You're either with us or against us.)
To: Lancey Howard
"That scumbag Cooper would have sung like a canary by now if there was anything damaging to Bush or Cheney to be told."
So why doesn't Novak just write a column detailing how he came across the information if it was a sting operation and the administration has nothing to hide?
56
posted on
08/10/2004 8:44:38 AM PDT
by
monday
To: Former Military Chick
What would ole Red think.
57
posted on
08/10/2004 8:45:57 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Former Military Chick
So who'll be interviewing Tater Russett on "Beat the Mess"?
58
posted on
08/10/2004 8:49:13 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: monday
So why doesn't Novak just write a column detailing how he came across the information if it was a sting operation and the administration has nothing to hide?Why should he? Note that Novak hasn't been cited for contempt by any court. He can sit back, reputation intact, and laugh as this whole thing plays out. And it WILL play out, one way or the other.
Funny how the Democrat operative, Cooper, is the one who is really on the hot seat, no? Russert is a sideshow, and he has not been cited for contempt since he is "cooperating".
I think Cooper is taking his marching orders from the other Democrat operative, his wife. Maybe Mandy is tired of the guy and sees this as a handy way to get rid of him, lol.
To: sissyjane; Admin Moderator
We addressed that long agon in this thread.
Sadly this will not be the first AP aricle that changes the merits by only changing the title.
Yet, having discussed the way it was titled those on the thread got a lot out of the behavior of the AP. Most are pretty bright to catch this. At least that is how I see it.
Thank you for your concern.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson