Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Military Chick

I don't see anywhere in the article that it says Russert has been held in contempt. Just Cooper.


4 posted on 08/09/2004 2:43:59 PM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brandon

Agreed, that's some really crappy journalism.


7 posted on 08/09/2004 2:45:33 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Brandon

Russert testified.

Cooper did not.


9 posted on 08/09/2004 2:45:53 PM PDT by pacocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Brandon

I don't see it either. Very false headline.


10 posted on 08/09/2004 2:46:02 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Brandon

It's hard for reporters to write articles when they're not handed them directly from staffers at the DNC.


17 posted on 08/09/2004 2:48:23 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Brandon
Shapiro said Russert answered ``only limited questions'' about the conversation with Libby ``without revealing any information he learned in confidence.''

Is it being inferred by this sentence?

26 posted on 08/09/2004 3:05:32 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 ("proud to be a Reagan Republican")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson