Posted on 08/09/2004 4:07:19 PM PDT by MadIvan
John Kerry is too strange to be president. I don't mean "strange" in the way of his predecessor. Al Gore, the first Android-American to run for president, was weird. But Kerry's strangeness is of an entirely different order.
For purposes of comparison, go back a couple of months to that fevered few weeks when Michael Moore, bigshot Democrats and the media were hounding Bush over his allegedly spotty attendance in the Texas Air National Guard during the early Seventies.
The point is, even if it were true, it fits the Bush narrative: he was a lackadaisical son of privilege who goofed around, drank too much, found Jesus, sobered up and got his life together. If you've got 30-year-old pictures of him dancing naked on a bar in Mexico when he was supposed to be back at the air base, so what? It's compatible with the official version. That's Bush: the bad stuff still fits the picture.
But with Kerry, even before any gaffes or scandals, the official narrative makes no sense. He's publicly opposed to the Vietnam War. But he volunteers for it. Then he comes back disgusted with his experience in war, publicly hurls his medals away (or someone else's: that story keeps changing), denounces his fellow veterans as war criminals, torturers and rapists, and claims that he personally committed atrocities.
But then he decides to run for president and suddenly Jane Fonda morphs into John Wayne and all those war criminals are war heroes he wants at every rally and he's got his medals back and his disgust at his wartime experience has mysteriously turned into pride in his wartime experience to the exclusion of all else.
If Steven Spielberg, Barbra Streisand or any of his other Hollywood supporters got a script like that, they'd send it to rewrite. Either that or they'd figure they'd got an early, rejected draft of the new Manchurian Candidate.
That's what people mean when they talk about how "complex" and "nuanced" Kerry is. They don't mean his positions on the great questions of the day are complex and nuanced.
Quite the contrary: for the purposes of this campaign, his entire political career – 20 years as Senator, Lieutenant-Governor to Michael Dukakis – has been dropped from his CV. If Kerry had exhibited the slightest trace of any interestingly complex view of any policy matter, you can be sure we'd have heard about it. But he hasn't.
So the only "complex" aspect of the Kerry campaign is the man himself, who's complex in ways that don't seem entirely healthy. My chums across the page were rather dismissive yesterday about "Swift Boat Veterans For Truth", a group of fellow officers who think he's unfit to be president.
Let's take it as read that Swiftees who support or oppose Kerry are "politically motivated": the fact is, the Swiftees opposed to him significantly outnumber the four who support him, which is interesting in itself. But consider just one of the items from their new book about him.
For decades, John Kerry has told anyone who'd listen that at Christmas 1968 he was on an illegal mission inside Cambodia. On the floor of the Senate in 1986, while attacking President Reagan for turning Central America into another Vietnam quagmire (wrong as usual), Kerry said: "I remember Christmas of 1968 sitting on a gunboat in Cambodia. I remember what it was like to be shot at by the Vietnamese and Khmer Rouge and Cambodians, and have the President of the United States telling the American people that I was not there; the troops were not in Cambodia. I have that memory which is seared – seared – in me."
The illegal Yuletide foray was so seared into him that he brought it up at every opportunity.
As he told the Boston Herald in 1979, "I remember spending Christmas Eve of 1968 five miles across the Cambodian border being shot at by our South Vietnamese allies who were drunk and celebrating Christmas. The absurdity of almost being killed by our own allies in a country in which President Nixon claimed there were no American troops was very real."
LBJ was President on Christmas Eve 1968, but let that pass. Here's an Associated Press story from 1992: "Navy Lt John Kerry knew he had no business steering his Mekong River patrol boat across the border into Cambodia, but orders were orders… By Christmas 1968, part of Kerry's patrol extended across the border of South Vietnam into Cambodia."
Just one problem. It never happened. Every living officer up his chain of command says Kerry was never ordered to Cambodia. At least three of his five crewmen say their boat was never in Cambodia. And if you don't believe any of his fellow veterans, read the excerpt from Kerry's own journal published in Tour Of Duty, the recent hagiography by Douglas Brinkley.
On December 24 1968, Kerry was at Sa Dec – that's well inside Vietnam, 55 miles from the Cambodian border – and waxing wistful to his diary about a quiet Christmas far from home: "Visions of sugarplums really do dance through your head and you think of stockings and snow and roast chestnuts and fires with birch logs and all that is good and warm and real. It's Christmas Eve."
I'm Vietnammed out. But it's the centrepiece of Kerry's campaign: the other day, asked a straightforward question about 9/11, he stuck to the current millennium for a good 20 seconds and then veered off into "the war that I fought in was a war where we saw America lose its support for the war, where the soldiers came back having had to do what our soldiers are doing today, carry an M-16 in another country, try to tell the difference between friend and foe. I know what it's like to go out at night on patrol", etc, etc. So, since Vietnam seems to be the only subject on which he has anything to say, it would be reassuring to know that at least he's got that right.
For most of his adult life John Kerry has peddled as his central Vietnam anecdote – the one that drove him to turn on his nation's leaders – what appears to be a complete fantasy. Why would he do such a thing? If there's a good answer to that question, maybe someone in his doting press pack would like to ask it.
BehaveNet® Clinical Capsule™: |
Individuals with this Cluster B Personality Disorder have an excessive sense of how important they are. They demand and expect to be admired and praised by others and are limited in their capacity to appreciate others' perspectives.
|
Now there's an idea for you: what if the "Watchdog of the People", a/k/a the "Fourth Estate", actually did their friggin' job, instead of curling aound the feet of their Master and quietly going to sleep?
What is nice about this story is that it involves latter day lies, it is neat, tidy, understandable, and even alliterative.
Mark Steyn...YOU ROCK!
BTTT
...except that no self-respecting voice would take residence in such a void.
Now, now, now. Kerry's a democrat, let's not let facts get in the way.
I want to be somebody! I want to be on the Steyn Ping list. Will I need to pick on posters who snip in respect of copyright. I sense the tension but we ALL love Steyn.
Excellent article!
I agree. I posted a condensed version of the DSM-IV criteria for NPD on 3/15/04 on a thread about how rude this man is to all around him. Everything I've seen since just reinforces my belief that this guy is not OK. Just my opinion, though.
All of this information is forming a personality profile on the guy. He's a guy who needs to feel important, needs the accolates, wants to live the good life, BUT DOES NOT OR IS INCAPABLE OF PUTTING IN THE WORK. He wanted to be a war hero..he took the path of least resistance...maybe he turned against the war because they basically told him to leave. Has anyone ever thought of that? NOBODY LIKED HIM, they tell him to leave. According to his Commander, he said he didn't want to, that he wanted to fight for his Country, but he leaves the next day and becomes and anti-war spokesperson, getting the attention he craves. He wants to be rich...so he marries the wealthiest woman he can find. It's a pattern through his life. He's a Senator, but he rarely shows up for work. GOD HELP US if this guy wins.
Kerry is not complicated at all, if you remove some of claims--his rewriting of his life story.
In fact, he was pro war--or indifferent to it. Most of all he planned to emulate his idol John F Kennedy to a bizarre degree.
To that end he got into the Navy (to avoid the draft), and then into a Swift Boat--a cutrate PT 109.
He did his best to rack up medals, even if he had to inflict the wounds himself. He got out as fast as he could so to run for Congress--as his hero did.
He then got his ass kicked because the war was not popular in Vietnam. This devastated him so much he was almost catatonic. (You've seen the pictures of him making the model airplane on the couch. That is from this time.)
He only snapped out of it when he realized he could jump on the anti-war bandwagon--even though he was a couple years behind the curve.
He pulled his strings (Teddy Kennedy) and got before the cameras in the Senate--and the rest is history.
Great piece! A Steyn quote argues with what
the Fox News/Brit Hume panel said tonight:
that the Kerry/Cambodia claim's NOT CENTRAL to Kerry's now-disputed record in Vietnam. All
(Barnes, Hume, Juan & Mara) agreed; the KEY
accounts that matter are about his medals &
if the Rassman rescue story is accurate.
But, Steyn selects this as a CENTRAL CLAIM
made by Kerry that is going to fall.
What do my fellow-freepers think?
What's even more damaging is that it provides credibility for the Swifties' story while tearing away at kerry's own credibility.
After initially denying the story and then being shown the truth of it, the campaign told Carl Cameron that they would have to "come up with an explanation". Why didn't they just say that they had to "ask the candidate"?
Christmas in Cambodia = Al Gore inventing the net+ Bill Clinton watching black churches burn.
In the dim tradition of lying this guy fits right in.
Christmas in Cambodia would seem to be what could get things rolling. We can prove this lie with documents. This will hopefully lead to more questions and finally his military records.
Christmas 66 and 67 Chu Lai Rvn. Mag 12 VMA-223
Tet 1968.
Tet- one of our guys got a purple heart during tet, he tripped over a pallet and broke his ankle during an attack.
He was awarded a PH. I seem to remember him trying to turn
it down but it was already in the system, put in by the sickbay.
...CENTRAL CLAIM...
So when it's a democrat, the things he lies about don't matter?
A first "breach" in the "wall"
of lies, then?
And that's just for starts! How many Vietnam Vets do YOU know that have married two millionairesses?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.