Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan

She would if in letting them surf unsupervised, she'd defied a court order saying she couldn't do that. That's why she went to the clink. Not because she smoked, but because she signed off on a custody arrangement that said she couldn't and she broke it.


7 posted on 08/13/2004 5:34:00 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile
Not because she smoked, but because she signed off on a custody arrangement that said she couldn't and she broke it.

I know. I was just trying to make a larger point. It amazes me that parents let kids have TVs in their bedrooms. You might as well feed them a bowl full of poison.

17 posted on 08/13/2004 5:38:57 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianInExile

and in some states, if you refuse to sign the agreement, it obtains the merit of order, the judge mandates it anyway and denies right to appeal.. and in some really bad states... the court referee does it with a stamp and without a judge... and once again NO APPEAL.

the government trespass into the family, has gone overboard.
"Agree to NOT smoke or we will take your kids away..."

is not a legitimate role of government.


391 posted on 08/16/2004 3:06:49 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson