Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/15/2004 5:06:07 AM PDT by bad company
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: bad company

What a crock!!!


2 posted on 08/15/2004 5:13:33 AM PDT by Ole Okie (Kerry has "Write-Only Memory"!! Sear it all you want - it can't be read!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

"including Knight Ridder (The Star's parent company), The Associated Press, and the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and The Washington Post wire services."

These are the sources they deem CREDIBLE?


3 posted on 08/15/2004 5:14:00 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company
Ahhhh yes . . . the 'ol "the newswires ate my homework" routine.
4 posted on 08/15/2004 5:15:08 AM PDT by geedee (The thing that impresses me the most about America is the way parents obey their children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

TRANSLATION: We were more than happy to keep this buried, but you whiners threatened to cancel your subscriptions. So we actually had to get off our elitist butts and say something.


6 posted on 08/15/2004 5:17:11 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("I'm just a gigolo, and everywhere I go, people know I'm lyin' about 'Nam".....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

Ah, so the internet and Swift Boat vets, more than one or two, aren't reliable sources, but news wires the Star subscribes to are? Like the NYTimes, the LATimes, the WashPost? Reuters, these same grouops who got together recently to decide how to manage the news from now until November? Something smells rotten. The KC Star has been caught with its pants down.


9 posted on 08/15/2004 5:21:47 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

So they bury the story on a Saturday.


13 posted on 08/15/2004 5:28:19 AM PDT by T Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

THink I am going to vomit.


14 posted on 08/15/2004 5:29:52 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company
The Star had been waiting for credible sources to move stories over the news wire


15 posted on 08/15/2004 5:29:56 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

Ok let me see if I have this right.

Major newspaper won't report information from personal websites because of questionable credibility. If anyone lacks credibility it is major newspapers such as the Boston Globe, the New York Times, or the Washington Post. Time does not allow me to go into their history of fabricating facts.

Still the very fact that a newspaper wrongly reported that a Swift Boat vet had recanted his story against Kerry shows that major newspapers are not that concerned with corroborating sources. So why isn't a personal website where at least the identity of the source can be independently confirmed by a newspaper's reader more credible than the anonymous or unnamed sources relied upon by major newspapers? Why not put the story out into the marketplace of ideas and let the truth prevail.

The reason for the decline of newspaper readership (and the majors inflate their circulation numbers) is because of lost credibility on the part of the major newspapers. I am convinced that people buy newspapers for the information from the advertisements not for the "News". Isn't that ironic?


16 posted on 08/15/2004 5:31:06 AM PDT by Harris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

Of course a "leak" from a Senate Democrat would be printed up, ASAP.


17 posted on 08/15/2004 5:31:13 AM PDT by syriacus (Benedict Arnold REALLY was a war hero ----- before he was a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

What is their record on reporting anything related to Bush....example..AWOL or DWI story?


20 posted on 08/15/2004 5:33:59 AM PDT by mystery-ak (The most dangerous place in the world...between Moore and Ronstadt in the buffet line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company
The Star subscribes to several news wire services — the aforementioned credible sources — including Knight Ridder (The Star's parent company), The Associated Press, and the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and The Washington Post wire services.

LOL!! Kinda says it all, doesn't it?

21 posted on 08/15/2004 5:34:59 AM PDT by RottiBiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company
Why the delay? The answer has to do with credibility. The Star had been waiting for credible sources to move stories over the news wire, which is how most of the news about national politics gets in the paper.

They'll be waiting indefinitely. These supposedly credible sources moved, on the news wire, the lie that Elliott had retracted part of his affidavit. Did the paper sit on that? Nope. They repeated and helped spread the lie.

Wire's credibility is no good. Paper's credibility is no good.

22 posted on 08/15/2004 5:35:23 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

"The Star subscribes to several news wire services — the aforementioned credible sources — including Knight Ridder (The Star's parent company), The Associated Press, and the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and The Washington Post wire services."

Credible sources?? No wonder the print media never gets it right (but usually gets it left).


24 posted on 08/15/2004 5:38:40 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

"The Star had been waiting for credible sources to move stories"

Not a crock. It says, the "credible" news wires are biased, left leaning, let's elect Kerry sources and they weren't running anything to harm Kerry.


27 posted on 08/15/2004 5:39:09 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmstein7

More evidence to support your lawsuit ping.


28 posted on 08/15/2004 5:40:28 AM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company
On Friday, a Google News search turned up dozens of references to the Kerry stories. Many of them were on fringe news and personal Internet pages, sites that The Star and other mainstream media don't recognize as credible by themselves.

With this lazy "see what the Times says" attitude, it won't be be many years until the "mainstream" press will be considered fringe news. The "mainstream" press is no longer credible to a large percentage of the country as is. And the presstitutes' extreme and open advocacy of Kerry isn't repairing any of the damage they've already done to themselves.

30 posted on 08/15/2004 5:41:50 AM PDT by Semi Civil Servant (I spent Chanukah in the Hamptons, and Christmas in Cambodia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company
It's seems to be a matter of "credibility" when people in the news media are too lazy and stupid to check the veracity of conservative charges for themselves, isn't it?

Meanwhile, the same people have no problem reporting the lies of Palestinians, feminists, eco-Nazis, the Clintons, the French.

It's the Orwellian memory hole, only much less competent and intelligent.

34 posted on 08/15/2004 5:50:43 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company

I am beginning to suspect that the mainstream media is fully aware that sKerry is full of sh!t on his Vietnam record, and knowing that sKerry has based his entire campaign on those 4 months, realize that to expose that record will end the current horse race for the presidency.

The media sells conflict, if the sKerry campaign implodes now, there is little for them to write about between now and November.

While I'm sure a lot of the reluctance is ideological, I suspect an at least equal portion of their reluctance is job security.


35 posted on 08/15/2004 5:52:59 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bad company
On Friday, a Google News search turned up dozens of references to the Kerry stories.

Dozens? My little search showed the following: Results 1 - 10 of about 1,390,000 for kerry +vietnam.

No wonder it's known as the Kansas City (Red) Star.

37 posted on 08/15/2004 6:02:44 AM PDT by barker (Never read the fine print. There ain't no way you're going to like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson