[Semper Paratus]

The Bush team has the 'rats chasing shadows.

[SunStar]

Many Democrats have criticized the selection of Goss, saying he is too partisan for a job that requires relaying objective advice to policy makers in the executive and legislative branches.

Yeah, he should be a Democrat!

[wagglebee]

I wish they would try to stop Goss's nomination. It would be great if Bush could go into a debate and point out how little the 'Rats actually care about intelligence.

[tomnbeverly]

I sure hope somebody tags John Kerry to say that he will or will not keep Goss if he is elected..... This will sure to spin the fight.

[zencat]

I think it was Norah O'Donnell or Cambell Brown (among others is the liberal media) that couldn't believe President Bush had nominated Porter Goss.

Let's see, he was a former agent and serves on the House intelligence committee.
Their shock was that:

1. He's a staunch Republican
2. He's been a strong supporter of President Bush.

Outrageous!

[spectre]

Perhaps the dems should recommend a national security expert more to their liking.

I hear Gov McGreevy's highly qualified pick is between jobs.

[Darkwolf377]

Did anyone else hear Jane the other day say that the 9-11 anniversary was "just days away"?

You can bet if a republican made that screwup we'd still be hearing baout it.

[mcg1969]

I tend to place Harman in the Feinstein wing of the California Democratic Party, as opposed to the Boxer wing.

That constitutes a very, very slight compliment on my part.

[montag813]

Despite the fact that they are the focus of evil in the modern world, the Democrats are no dummies. They know when to avoid a fight. They are all about PR, and play that game very well. Meanwhile the GOP had a goldmine PR issue in Miguel Estrada's fillibuster and choked, giving up a potential +10% gain in Hispanic votes in the process.