Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McClintock: Plates Killed by 'Friend'
Good News, Etc. ^ | August, 2004 | Dana Serrano Chisholm

Posted on 08/16/2004 1:16:29 PM PDT by jettester

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
I found this while reading a local, small Christian Newspaper from San Diego County. Has anyone else heard of this position by McClintock and why he voted the way he did?
1 posted on 08/16/2004 1:16:30 PM PDT by jettester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: broomhilda

**Ping**


2 posted on 08/16/2004 1:31:28 PM PDT by TwoStep (Ignorance can be cured, stupid is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jettester

Assuming this is correct, I still like McClintock even though it's a smudge on his record. No representative gets 'em all right.


3 posted on 08/16/2004 1:34:51 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jettester
The only rationale I can think that would explain McClintock's vote in this matter is that a "Choose Life" plate would have paved the way for all manner of Leftist-sponsored special interest causes.

And between you and me, I'd rather not have a "Gay Marriage" plate here in California...

McClintock is right, though. If the car owner has a strong opinion, let 'em get bumper stickers. It's not up to the state to affirm their views with vanity plates.

4 posted on 08/16/2004 1:37:03 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The press is no longer free. Its bias exacts a heavy price with every report.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jettester

Personally, I would never put a license plate with any political message on my car. I rarely even put bumper stickers on it.


5 posted on 08/16/2004 1:43:13 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jettester

Biting my tongue...


6 posted on 08/16/2004 1:50:44 PM PDT by Tamzee (Tell me honestly, Honey... do these classified documents make me look fat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jettester

I think getting bumper stickers is just fine. I just cleaned some old ones off my car, but the thing is still a rolling billboard. I wonder what the CHP thinks of all these specialty plates. Sometimes I see these plates from far away and can't tell what state they are from.


7 posted on 08/16/2004 1:57:36 PM PDT by Better Dead Than Red (Davis College Republicans (Best Party on Campus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I hadn't heard anything on this prior to this post, but I agree with McClintock. Once the mold is cast to allow political issues on vehicle license plates, expect to see them for other political issues such as same sex marriage, pro abortion, and amnesty for illegal aliens.

McClintock didn't backtrack. He saw the potential possibilities and didn't like what he saw. There is a world of difference between vanity plates and political specialty plates.
8 posted on 08/16/2004 2:05:53 PM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jettester

Wow, the "real conservative" Californian voting against a pro-life license plate...

Who'da thunk it???

But, then, it is Arnold, who is the stinking, rotten RINO (/sarc, gag)


9 posted on 08/16/2004 2:08:00 PM PDT by El Conservador ("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jettester
It took me about 20 seconds on Google to find this reply from McClintock:

From the Desk of Senator Tom McClintock

Dear (Name removed):

I have been shown an e-mail from a Dana Serrano Chisolm that has been circulated on the Internet regarding my vote on ab477. It contains a wealth of misinformation and I would appreciate your help in setting the record straight.

First, she describes the measure as a "Choose-Life Plates Bill." In fact, the measure says nothing about "Choose Life" license plates. Its actual effect is to provide for automatic DMV approval of ALL specialty plates that attract 7,500 applicants - which would include license plates supporting and funding abortion, gay rights, and every other liberal cause you can imagine.

Second, she says that I voted "No" on the bill. In fact, I abstained from voting on the bill, as did pro-life senators Bill Morrow and Roy Ashburn. I did so because I oppose the politicization of California's license plates and the out-of-control proliferation of such plates that this bill would unleash.

Finally, it should also be noted that this bill permits a sponsoring organization to siphon off 25 percent of the funds raised from the license plates for "administrative purposes," which means that some individuals would be making a great deal of money from it. That may explain the agitated tone of the e-mail.

I invite you to review the bill, committee analyses and committee vote at www.senate.ca.gov. Use the "Legislation" link to look up the bill.

Sincerely,

Tom McClintock

 


10 posted on 08/16/2004 2:08:58 PM PDT by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

There are already a long list of special interest licence plates in California.

Please see this link:


http://www.dmv.ca.gov/online/elp/elp.htm

The proceeds from these licence plates are used to fund various special causes.

Environmental license plates

September 11th California Memorial License Plates

California Arts License Plate

Whale Tail License Plate, sponsored by the California Coastal Commission

Collegiate License Plate funds need-based scholarships

Lake Tahoe License Plates are deposited in the Tahoe Conservancy Account

Yosemite License Plates benefit Yosemite National Park

California Firefighter Plate are deposited in the California Firefighters' Memorial fund.

Kids License Plate are deposited in the Child Health and Safety Fund

Olympic Training Center License Plate supports the U. S. Olympic Committee's training center

Veteran License Plate benefits participating county veterans service offices


11 posted on 08/16/2004 2:21:47 PM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener

Yup, a whole pandora's box out there.


12 posted on 08/16/2004 2:25:30 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture ("... But the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jettester
Tom is no idiot. He's holding out when again next year nothing has changed in the state budget, for the ones that say, "Don't Blame Me I voted for Tom". Next week we find out that Tom uses Northern tissues instead of Charmin. Send him to the guillotine... Maybe AS is correct. If this is the issues that these pols have to deal with then maybe 5 days per yr in Sacramento is enough.
13 posted on 08/16/2004 2:28:37 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
What you said.

Thankyou for sparing me the effort of typing the same post you just did.

14 posted on 08/16/2004 2:46:36 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
The only rationale I can think that would explain McClintock's vote in this matter is that a "Choose Life" plate would have paved the way for all manner of Leftist-sponsored special interest causes.

Good point.

15 posted on 08/16/2004 2:51:47 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener

Thanks for the info. I suspected as much.


16 posted on 08/16/2004 2:53:47 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener
Wish you had waited awhile before posting your reply.

It would have been interesting to see more replies laced with emotion based on the limited information in the original article.

Oh well. Reminds me of thousands of other threads that generated enough heat to warm New York City in December only to later learn that the original article was inaccurate.

17 posted on 08/16/2004 3:07:41 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jettester

This might be a good thing...I can only imagine what the communists would start putting on plates all over the country...bumber stickers are annoying enough.

Although, they do help you pinpoint communists and their supporters in the area very well...


18 posted on 08/16/2004 3:18:14 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (DemocRATS are communists and want to destroy America only to replace it with the USSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener

RIGHT ON TOM! Too bad our gene pool has been compromised so horrifically...too few appreciate wisdom and logic and truth these days.


19 posted on 08/16/2004 3:19:53 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (DemocRATS are communists and want to destroy America only to replace it with the USSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Oh well. Reminds me of thousands of other threads that generated enough heat to warm New York City in December only to later learn that the original article was inaccurate.

If there's one thing I've learned from four years of hanging out on FR (and the odd exploratory foray onto DU), it's that there are a lot of people out there who WANT to be outraged.

20 posted on 08/16/2004 3:28:52 PM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson