Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monday
Really? What if a company had a rule prohibiting crosses because they were offensive to Muslims? What if the company had rules against prayer mats because they offended Catholics?

They should have the right to do the above, as it is THEIR company.

What if a company had rules prohibiting all non Muslims from working there because they were offensive to Muslims? What if a company had rules prohibiting blacks from working for them because they offended white supremacists?

All the above should be OK as well, as it is THEIR company. No one has the right not to be offended.

So who decides who has to be tolerant of what

The owners

Why is it the majority has to be tolerant of minorities but minorities don't have to be tolerant of the majority?

Yeah, that sucks that that's the case. No one should be forced to tolerate another on their own private property.

18 posted on 08/17/2004 3:07:48 PM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Guillermo
you said: "All the above should be OK as well, as it is THEIR company."

Thats not the way it works. If you discriminate against anyone for reasons of race, religion, or sex, you will be fined and sued until you have no money left.

You said: " No one has the right not to be offended."

lol, I think everyone has the right "not to be offended". Are you sure thats what you meant? I am rarely offended by others, and I never even considered that I might not have that right?
34 posted on 08/18/2004 10:32:17 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson