Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran warns of preemptive strike to prevent attack on nuclear sites
Yahoo News ^ | 8/18/04 | AFP

Posted on 08/19/2004 4:54:45 PM PDT by PattonReincarnated

DOHA (AFP) - Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani warned that Iran might launch a preemptive strike against US forces in the region to prevent an attack on its nuclear facilities.

"We will not sit (with arms folded) to wait for what others will do to us. Some military commanders in Iran are convinced that preventive operations which the Americans talk about are not their monopoly," Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera TV when asked if Iran would respond to an American attack on its nuclear facilities.

// clip


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; irannukenuclear; irannukes; iraq; preemption; weapons; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Bring it on!
1 posted on 08/19/2004 4:54:46 PM PDT by PattonReincarnated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

What's left to say?


2 posted on 08/19/2004 4:57:13 PM PDT by Mr.Atos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

Go ahead, make my day!

3 posted on 08/19/2004 4:58:14 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

Strike on US forces in the region is a declaration of war. The Iranian government is either a) really scared b) really stupid or c) has some secret weapon we don't know about.


4 posted on 08/19/2004 5:02:25 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

When are we going to quit pissing around with these dumb shit ragheads? We could be in downtown Tehran TWICE as fast as we were Baghdad.


5 posted on 08/19/2004 5:03:30 PM PDT by Slump Tester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
The desire for martyrdom must run REALLY strong with that bunch of sandmaggots.
6 posted on 08/19/2004 5:04:30 PM PDT by datura (The Difference Between a Democrat and a Communist Is????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

As the statement worms its way down the food chain.


7 posted on 08/19/2004 5:05:38 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

really stupid is about right.


8 posted on 08/19/2004 5:07:23 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

save our troops..limited nuclear strikes, send a "strong" message.


9 posted on 08/19/2004 5:13:36 PM PDT by kcinnh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

Sounds like an imminent threat to the security of the US.


10 posted on 08/19/2004 5:15:17 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Don't confuse disagreement with argumentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated
Iran might launch a preemptive strike against US forces in the region to prevent an attack on its nuclear facilities.

Might be the best thing to happen to the Iranian people in a long time. The hated mullahs would not be around very long after such an event.

11 posted on 08/19/2004 5:15:21 PM PDT by sionnsar (Iran Azadi ||| Resource for Traditional Anglicans: trad-anglican.faithweb.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

How much can Kerry do in the old Swift boat if he gets recalled?


12 posted on 08/19/2004 5:18:49 PM PDT by kcinnh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

More North Korea style bull$hit saber rattling.


13 posted on 08/19/2004 5:23:19 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers (When the government seeks to give the people all they want, it will soon take all they have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

This would never happen because it would invite the US military to destroy the Iranian military and bring about the end of the rule of the mullahs in Iran. This is just crap for internal consumption.


14 posted on 08/19/2004 5:23:35 PM PDT by David1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated

Go ahead mad mullahs, make our day!


15 posted on 08/19/2004 5:24:14 PM PDT by doug9732
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani warned that Iran might launch a preemptive strike against US forces in the region to prevent an attack on its nuclear facilities.


 "We will not sit (with arms folded) to wait for what others will do to us. Some military commanders in Iran are convinced that preventive operations which the Americans talk about are not their monopoly," Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera TV when asked if Iran would respond to an American attack on its nuclear facilities.

"America is not the only one present in the region. We are also present, from Khost to Kandahar in Afghanistan; we are present in the Gulf and we can be present in Iraq (news - web sites)," said Shamkhani, speaking in Farsi to the Arabic-language news channel through an interpreter.

"The US military presence (in Iraq) will not become an element of strength (for Washington) at our expense. The opposite is true, because their forces would turn into a hostage" in Iranian hands in the event of an attack, he said.

Shamkhani, who was asked about the possibility of an American or Israeli strike against Iran's atomic power plant in Bushehr, added: "We will consider any strike against our nuclear installations as an attack on Iran as a whole, and we will retaliate with all our strength.

"Where Israel is concerned, we have no doubt that it is an evil entity, and it will not be able to launch any military operation without an American green light. You cannot separate the two."

A commander of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards was quoted in the Iranian press earlier Wednesday as saying that Tehran would strike the Israeli reactor at Dimona if Israel attacks the Islamic republic's own burgeoning nuclear facilities.


"If Israel fires one missile at Bushehr atomic power plant, it should permanently forget about Dimona nuclear center, where it produces and keeps its nuclear weapons, and Israel would be responsible for the terrifying consequence of this move," General Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr warned.
Iran's controversial bid to generate nuclear power at its plant being built at Bushehr is seen by arch-enemies Israel and the United States as a cover for nuclear weapons development.

The latest comments mark an escalation in an exchange of threats between Israel and Iran in recent weeks, leading to speculation that there may be a repeat of Israel's strike against Iraqi nuclear facilities at Osirak in 1981.

Iran insists that its nuclear intentions are peaceful, while pointing at its enemy's alleged nuclear arsenal, which Israel neither confirms nor denies possessing.
Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera it was not possible "from a practical standpoint" to destroy Iran's nuclear programs because they are the product of national skills "which cannot be eliminated by military means."

He also warned that Iran would consider itself no longer bound by its commitments to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the event of an attack.
"The execution of such threats (to attack Iran's nuclear installations) would mean that our cooperation with the IAEA led to feeding information about our nuclear facilities to the attacking side, which (in turn) means that we would no longer be bound by any of our obligations" to the nuclear watchdog, he said.

Diplomats said in Vienna Tuesday that the IAEA would not say in a report next month whether Iran's nuclear activities are of a military nature, nor will it recommend bringing the case before the UN Security Council.
The IAEA board is due to deliver the report on Iran's nuclear activities during a meeting at the organization's headquarters in Vienna from September 13 after the last of a group of IAEA inspectors returned from Iran last week.

The UN's nuclear agency is conducting a major probe into Iran's bid to generate electricity through nuclear power.

The Islamic republic has agreed to temporarily suspend uranium enrichment pending the completion of the IAEA probe, but is working on other parts of the fuel cycle and has recently resumed making centrifuges used for enrichment.


16 posted on 08/19/2004 5:26:24 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"and has recently resumed making centrifuges used for enrichment."

If the IAEA knows this, then it's a smoking gun, right? Would they use these to refine uranium for fuel consumption? Or just for making warheads? Could it be used for both?

I've got a better idea... *sticks head in sand*

This is what the UN always does, and it works great! [/sarcasm]

17 posted on 08/19/2004 5:29:04 PM PDT by mbennett203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PattonReincarnated
That is very nice.
They have threatened to ATTACK the United States of America.
Yes the USA. Every troop is the USA IMHO.
This is like declaring war on us, and we should respond. They threaten preemptive strikes, we should do one or 23 or what ever it takes.
Who do they think they are, Israel?
Those cowardly Islamic Terrorists "religious" leaders wet their pants when Israel took out their Nuclear plant in the 90's.
They didn't do anything about that but for good reason. It's hard to drill through glass.
18 posted on 08/19/2004 5:29:32 PM PDT by Embedded Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcinnh
How much can Kerry do in the old Swift boat if he gets recalled?

I vote for trying it and finding out, no?

19 posted on 08/19/2004 5:32:54 PM PDT by sionnsar (Iran Azadi ||| Resource for Traditional Anglicans: trad-anglican.faithweb.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

I pick "A" and "B" .


20 posted on 08/19/2004 5:33:23 PM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno-World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson