Posted on 08/19/2004 8:12:50 PM PDT by bobono
hehe!Someone tell this guy - it's sKerry-Edwards that will get trounced November 2nd ! :^D
.
HILLARY & TERRORISM's plan to regain the White House
http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1022571/posts
.
.
In a new Time of War...
.."IS it SAFE?" = HILLARY on Senate Armed Services Committee..
http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=629
.
Regards, Ivan
The only reason they're giving this story legs is to discredit it fully. They're following marching orders from the Kerry campaign.
Not going to happen. If they remove Kerry from the ticket (which they are not going to do), it will be so damaged that anyone they put up in his place won't have a chance.
That, actually, has been a very effective tool for me this election run-up. Liberals, being the emotional-sensitive types, really seem to "get it" when I point out that the "Anyone but Bush" campaign, if successful, will be the first election based on hate in our history. "How can anything good come from that?", I ask. While I realy abhor moronic rhetorical questions like that, it has resonated nicely a few times. While I doubt I made any converts to grassroots conservatism, I bet a few won't go to the polls to support a campaign of hate, no matter how much they are told to dislike GWB, Ashcroft, etc.
If you think Hillary! as president is too terrible to ponder consider this....
The position she really wants is chief justice of the Supreme Court. She knows she can't be elected to the presidency but if the right Democrat can be elected in '08 she has a very good chance to be appointed, and approved by the Democrat dominated Senate for the post she has been salivating over since she was in law school. She encourages that talk about running for president only as a diversion to her real ambition.
Wow. You are scary.
Bayh is well-spoken and articulate but Ford strikes me as too partisan, too slick, and corrupt to the core. Besides, this is the Clinton's party and as I previously posted, the price they will demand for their considerable support will be that they nominate Hillary! for the Supreme Court.
at some point Bush needs to attack Kerry.
I think Bush is too nice of a guy to go on the attack. I think the strategy from Karl Rove's point of view is to wait until after the Republican convention to start a new ad campaign against Kerry's proposed policies.
Hillary in?
Hey! McxGreevey resigned he's available. No wait, he sucks too.
It's an interesting thought and many of us have speculated that the plan all along was for Hillary to fly in on her broom at the convention. But I think that her current plan is now to go for 2008.
Plus, don't forget Edwards. If Kerry drops out or is pushed out and they don't bump Edwards up then you basically have the RATS admitting that they nominated TWO people who aren't fit to command.
If it CAN happen, it will. Hildebeast would know how, and it would be her best chance to get elected.
However, I'm not sure it CAN. John Edwards would seem to be the candidate, by default, if J.F'n.K. drops out.
Hillary has no intention of running this year. But a self-destructing Kerry will leave her the prohibitive favorite for 2008.
Anything is possible, I suppose. My brother called be a couple of hours
ago and he still thinks hitlery will swoop in and "save the party".He's a staunch GOP, too. He's voting for Bush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.