Posted on 08/19/2004 8:12:50 PM PDT by bobono
Kerry is being revealed as unelectable. Even the liberal press covers the swift boat issue, instead of significant developments in Iraq, Iran, etc. The press is preparing Kerry for early exit, and will indirectly promote Hillary as the only remaining electable dem candidate - they know it is absolutely imperative for her to get through the "campaign" WITHOUT debate, questions, etc. She knows there will not be enough time for her to answer to the public or engage in debates if she achieves the nomination in late September. She needs to be elected in an unconventional manner, or she will be defeated. This, along with the potential for terror in September/October, places her on the ticket with no risk of being required to actually explain herself, her issues, or her dripping evil. She'll slip right in, pantsuit and all, and immediately commence great harm upon this nation. I did not believe she could be willing to wait until 2008 or 2012 - her looks have already crumbled to sub-ogre level and four more years of physical and moral degradation will not enahnce her position.
I'm sure I mentioned that we have to lay off of Kerry till after September 2nd.
Mental illness can be controlled with medication.
Hillary, the old hag and dry bag, will run in 2008.
You speak from experience? Why the unpleasant comment?
boboyes
Why not. Please elaborate - I am very interested.
And who would be the charming VP in this scenario ....?
October 9.
While it's not unlike the DNC to propose your idea to it's base, I simply don't believe it would be realistic. Not all Democrats are as crazy and worthless as the hard core looney left. Replacing Kerry with Hillary would cause at least 25% of them to simply stay home out of sheer embarrassment!
10 9 04? Why?
P: Hillary the Hag
VP: Jesse Jackson
The minorities would eat it up! Women and blacks!
"While I agree Hillary won't be very upset if Kerry loses, I don't think your scenario is plausible."
Me too. Kerry will resign within a month and Edwards will be the new candidate unless he refuses. Don't know who will be the new veep but it wont be the Beast.
She's a shreaker too. She comes across as a hysterical, know it all broad.
Look at Maggie Thatcher and that's your template for knowing when we have found woman who will be elected President.
Would there be enough time for her to be placed on all the state ballots? The republican controlled states would not allow the last minute switch on the ballot. This would be much tougher than what happened in New Jersey with Torricelli.
IMHO, if you want to talk about hate and motivating your base of voters, then put Hillary on the ticket.
She would bring Republicans and Independents out of the woodwork to vote against her.
It's too close to the Clinton fiasco and the way they left office. She has to wait until 2008, so some of the "stench" can fade from people's memories before she's a viable candidate.
Embarassment? This from a group of people that cheer an impeached lying, masturbating, rapist as their annoited leader? This from a group that thinks Mickey Moore is a answered prayer? The more bizarre, the more direct route to socialism - the more probable dem success, IMHO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.