Posted on 08/19/2004 8:12:50 PM PDT by bobono
Then she needs three weeks of "listening to America" from NBC studios in NY, with three two-hour shows a day moderated by Katie, Barbara, and Oprah.
That's all she can tolerate, so 'Effin has to stay in until 10/9/04.
Do you know of something specific?
Here is my conspiracy theory on this matter...
The liberals are desperate and are doing things now they only do when theyre losing. Right? I can see a physical accident in the cards, where someone drops out due to necessity and Hillary walks in with her fat butt and all, trying her best to look and act like a man. Tell me I'm way off.
What are these elections except polarized? Yes, she makes you hate her o rlove her - and nobody that currently hates her is going to vote for Kerry. But there are a lot more of dems that will go out and vote for Hill that might not vote Kerry. Dems want this one badly - Supremes in play!
Spawn of Satan will run in 2008 if Kerry loses. She's not running this time, and hanging on to some far-fetched theory like this is about like those who hung on to the notion that Clinton would never relinquish power, right up to Bush's inauguration.
MM
one word...
"Wellstone."
In any case, taking Kerry off the ballot would spell doom for the Dems at all levels, and they know it. The GOP might end up with 60+ Senate seats if they tried that kind of crap.
I think you underestimate them. After all, they ARE planning to vote for Kerry.
Ain't she purdy! Isn't she standing next to Bubba in this picture? You could show him in his overalls, with his thumbs stuck in the straps, with an equally toothless grin!
Doesn't require an car aciddent, just a little Kerry meltdown manufactured by the media, but either way, the BS that is gonna occur from the dems in 04 is nothing compared to their BS in election 2000...
>>Can any of you name any candidate for President that has ever pulled out or been replaced after a party convention?>>
Can you name another time as this when the Dems have tried THIS level of deceitful posturing and filth in an election?
I disagree. Hillary would be the most dangerous candidate we have seen in quite awhile. It is the height of folly to think she is unelectable and would not be a formidable adversary.
Hillary under the right circumstances could and would be elected President. Never underestimate an enemy such as her.
Who knows who is way off on their theories? It's hard to put anything past someone like Hillary, who I believe is determined to be the first lady prez.
Wait a sec, you may be way off on your point that she has to try her best to act like a man, I think she's got that part down pat.
If she gets on the ballot at the last minute, we'll be hip-deep in chads.
There isn't enough beer in the planet for me to make it through - a second time...
Hillary has the nationalized health care card, an ace about now. With the Rats, that is.
Until then,
IT'S A GOOD THING WHEN KERRY'S DOWN IN THE POLLS, YOU FREAKING PATHETIC PARANOIACS!!!!!!!!
To dismiss potential application of clinton evils as fantasy is to ignore expreience. How many "firsts" can you name that occurred thru Clinton corruption? I am more than happy to see her wait until 2008 - like I said - she'll be uglier than a toad's **** by then, and far less relevant then than she is today...
Put me down as a pathetic paranoiac, when it comes to her Thighness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.