Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: olde north church
At the end of WWII as Europe begin to give up colonies in Asia and Africa, Ho Chi Minh approached America for assistance in removing the French from French Indo-China (Vietnam). The Americans refused because of alliances with the French. When America refused, he went to the Soviets who did so, gladly.

Now, is that a "Liberal" myth or is it basically correct?

That is my understanding. (Again-the word 'French' rears its ugly head!)

I always believed our involvement in Vietnam-to prevent the communists from complete take-over-was justified. And I always believed it was Kennedy's and Johnson's war--but somehow-the hippie, anti-war kerry's of this world managed to screw Nixon and label the war as his. Our press has so crushed the truth for so long, in order to re-write our history and push their liberal agenda.

They used the word 'quagmire' to describe the Iraqi war (once again, ala kerry, to destroy the moral of our nation and worse, our courageous troops over there) and referred to the Vietnam War, hoping America will always see that as a republican led war, as well.

The network press corp is my enemy.

448 posted on 08/22/2004 8:56:00 AM PDT by Republic (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]


To: Republic; olde north church

Supposedly at the end of WWII, there was a quasi-deal for Indochinese independence, but we reneged on that as a concession to the French. When the French ran into big trouble in the 50s, i.e. Dien Bien Phu, they even asked Eisenhower for nuclear assistance. After they left we assumed the reponsibilty in fighting the Communists.


494 posted on 08/22/2004 9:37:29 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson