Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanInTokyo; ambrose
This is the key passage...

Then who was the OinC on the Boston Whaler?

Here's what John O'Neill said about that in his interview with David Limbaugh (emphasis mine):

John O’Neill: We have to distinguish two things. First, two crewmen, Zaldonis and Runyon, both say that they did not see any hostile fire and do not know if there was any or not. That is my understanding of their current story. At least that is how they are quoted in Tour of Duty and other books. They say that they and Kerry were the only ones on the boat and they say Schachte was not present on the boat. Now, that is a different matter from what they told Dr. Letson and Grant Hibbard all those years ago. David: As to Schachte or just as to the hostile fire?

John O’Neill: As to the hostile fire.

David: Okay.

John O’Neill: Admiral Schachte places himself on the boat. He was the acting Judge Advocate General of the Navy and was an Admiral in the Navy. In fact, the policies would have required his presence because an officer in charge had to be present on the boat. In addition to Schachte placing himself there, there are a variety of other witnesses that all place him on that same boat.

David: First hand knowledge witnesses, right?

John O’Neill: Correct, first hand knowledge witnesses. People on the PCF that accompanied the boat, as well as people back at base at that time. People like Ted Peck who was a fellow officer in charge of a boat.

So now we have placed Schachte back on the skimmer with Kerry on 2 December and his testimony becomes that much stronger. And Schachte insists that no hostile fire occurred on 2 December, negating the entire basis for Kerry's Purple Heart. Meanwhile, Kerry's explanations become more and more tortured, and they still refuse to release the entirety of the records. They have not even produced an after-action report for 2 December that would support any indication of inbound enemy fire. Why? From all indications, it doesn't exist.

63 posted on 08/26/2004 2:20:27 PM PDT by Dog ( formerly known as VC-- - - - - - Combat Dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


Hi LIBS! FR LURKERS! SPIES!

Having a good time???!!!

Ready for even MORE fun? Sorry you nominated that shill and phony as your candidate, your one hope of kicking Bush out??!!! BWAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

71 posted on 08/26/2004 2:21:57 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Kerry Predicted in 1971 "No Bloodbath in Cambodia". TWO MILLION then died: April '75 to January '79)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Dog

"They have not even produced an after-action report for 2 December that would support any indication of inbound enemy fire. Why? From all indications, it doesn't exist."

But they may have those precious naval documents that show the admiral was definitely on the boat. or maybe Kerry's own documents place him there.


92 posted on 08/26/2004 2:31:48 PM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson