Posted on 08/26/2004 4:04:32 PM PDT by OESY
To put it bluntly, everything you read today by sportswriters about tournament tennis prior to 1968 and the advent of the big-money professional game is completely wrong. For one thing, between 1930 and 1968 very few champions or top players were rich young men. Far from it....Perhaps from a distance they looked rich when they were tennis stars. They behaved like gentlemen. It was insisted upon....
But beginning in 1968, a strange reversal occurred. The teenagers could not act like adults because the adults -- even on Ivy League campuses -- had joined the kids, adopting their distinctive music, hair styles and garish costumery.
The result? Behavior began to change. The epitome of this was John McEnroe, a very great player, also a barbaric brat. Even the beauty of Wimbledon could not evoke respect. Unacceptable too was Jimmy Connors, a great player only a little better behaved than Mr. McEnroe. In his early career, Andre Agassi played excellent tennis but dressed like he was trying out for King of the Kids....
Pete Sampras... seemed to have a sense of his place in tennis history, his demeanor good except for a slouching pout when things went badly. Mr. Agassi has morphed into a virtual statesman of tennis as he moves dignified toward Olympus. My present favorite is the Belgian Justine Henin-Hardenne....
But did the ideal largely disappear here with the collapse of the Eastern Establishment? A wit once quipped, "Today, the working class is Democratic, the middle class is Republican, and the upper class is Communist." Many Establishment patriarchs tolerated sons and daughters who went radical in 1968. Any responsible head of family would have disinherited them with a flick of the pen, for a betrayal of family honor. Power may have died with courage and a conviction of responsibility....
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Don Budge and Bobby Riggs knew how to behave on the court.
Has his joke of a cable show hit a zero viewership rating yet?
One of my prized possessions is an autographed cover of Sports Illusutrated from the early '70s - 'Bobby Riggs - Don't Bet Against This Man.'
Great conversation starter!
Stan Smith--the ultimate class act of tennis--what a gentleman (and a scholar!).
Don't you miss Ilie Nastase ??
Always fun to watch. Also a very good tennis player.
People started watching tennis when Nastase, Connors,and McEnroe were in their prime. (There were also some great tennis players who were better behaved also. Lendl, Borg, etc, but for pure enjoyment, nothing beats Ilie !!)
It's no secret why these guys aren't gentlemen anymore...they're all card-carrying spoiled liberals. Just check the public record!
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/hof.php?#SPORTS-TENNIS
(click names, right-hand column)
What about big Bill Tilden? There was a man's man.
Literally.
This guy clearly knows nothing about Sampras. Sampras is a spoiled brat, egotistical and cares nothing about the sport of tennis other than what it provides him.
Six out of the thousands of tennis players is hardly license to condemn them all. The reason they are not gentlemen any longer is because they are no longer expected to be. Take a look at Tim Henman or Patrick Rafter. Gentlemen through and through.
Notice the two you cite are not Americans?
Bobby let us all down when he threw that phony match with the dike.
People can say McEnroe is a brat if they like, but I met Nasase once in Hawaii in 1976, and he said that McEnroe was right--the judging was bad.
There are two schools of thought about appropriate behavior in the face of bad judging. One holds that becoming angry at it is always wrong, the other holds that it is understandable.
Thanks for the link. Very interesting.
Of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.