Posted on 08/29/2004 12:40:24 AM PDT by risk
much of Sherman's thinking is currently inherent in American military doctrine of the last two decades: despite our power, our forces usually react to the aggression of others, target enemy command and control and the property of the government and elite, and seekin Iraq, Panama, and Afghanistanto liberate residents from an oppressive regime. Yet often such attack, however precise, makes life miserable for an enemy citizenry and therefore prompts them to act against the authors of their calamity. The Afghanis, like the citizens of Georgia in their animus shown the plantationists, will come to blame the Taliban for the general bedlam brought on by the American counterattack. Victor Davis Hanson, An Autumn of War: What America Learned From September 11 and the War on Terrorism, New York: Anchor Books, 2002. (The article quoted above was written 25 September 2001) For a contrary view, go to "The Lessons of Terror" / "Between War and Peace" |
||||
Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and author of books such as The Wars of the Ancient Greeks (London: Cassell, 1999) and Carnage and Culture (New York: Doubleday, 2001). He is also a columnist for the National Review Online and print publications. Hanson's An Autumn of War is a collection of essays written from 11 September 2001 to 22 December 2001. Each is valuable as a record of recent history and as a thought-provoking assessment of the way ahead. As one example, Hanson writes compellingly of General Sherman and the American way of war. In an article written on 25 September he writes:
|
But Victorious.
Cheering in the streets of Arab capitals and posters of bin Laden will disappear only when the ignorant understand the terrible costs of supporting the murderers of Americans.
Uh-oh ping.
We can, should and will make a bunch of Muslims - millions of them - howl. The Muslims are too crazy, nasty and stupid to realize that there are enough good Americans to destroy their caliphate dream - and some of us will enjoy it. To paraphrase Patton, "This war - (against the Muslims) - will make (a lot of) other things pale into insignificance."
We've also put Iran and the DPRK on notice that their efforts to arm themselves with WMD are going to be stopped. This is reasonable given the rhetoric they've used even after 9/11. Their time may come sooner than anyone thinks.
The left should consider that President Bush has had more draconian alternatives but hasn't taken them. He is taking the course of proportional response. The next attack may require a much more massive reprisal. And there are many Americans who are far to the right of President Bush, and far less merciful. Perhaps the left would be wise to let the President's programs take their course.
I sure didn't mean this to be partisan. In winning the war on terrorism, we will have to learn from all kinds of sources -- including our own history.
That secession is "rebellion", is the greatest fiction in all annals of American history. Federalist 39.
"In Sherman's view it was far more humane to attack the property of those responsible for the conflict than to end the lives of those who were not."
I'm sure Ralph Nader feels the same way when he attacks corporations with government forces, in hopes of saving the poor hapless consumer.
I don't want to refight the war between the states on this thread. I want to beat al Qaeda. Guess who would like us to refight the war between the states?
This one is a stinker. Better check the facts!
al Qaeda? :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.