Omitting posts of mine that MIGHT be called "personal attacks" by someone hypersensitive (although I found only three that referred directly to other posters at all), my posts # 21, 22, 27, 28, 33, 53, 85, 123, 134, and #137 had nothing of the kind. You are, to be VERY kind, exxagerating severely, in the face of easily available facts. You're also quite sensitive to disagreement, aren't you? DISAGREEMENT, Joe, and a statement of it, does not constitute an "attack", nor does pointed questioning or analysis. In actuality, only one post I can find came anywhere near an attack. You just killed your credibility there.
" Your's sure weren't."
I'll let others decide that...the others who read this thread. You are hardly unbiased.
" Not by you."
I just asked questions. Others DID, so that comment was irrelevant. Besides, the things I did post were accurate.
"You see, I don't have to refute your posts with facts because you don't present facts. All you do is insult and smear so all you are worth is insults in return."
Let's get this straight...you first lie about my posts being "attacks and smears", when you have been doing just that for the past fifty posts at least, then you claim no need to refute with facts? Incredible.
To all: anyone wishing to verify Joe's contentions is advised to read the whole thread. It's illuminating.
I guess once you're through pasting the latest pamphlets, attacks and slander are all one has after people respond with logic, reason, and Constitutional cites.
And you wonder why I so profoundly mistrust those, like you Joe, who insist that "just this little bit" of tyranny is O-K?
Like I said, I don't bother to respond to your posts with evidence because your posts are worthless ignorance. I'm sure my "quote salads" won't make any sense to you anyway. Just stick to personal attacks wihich is what you know best.