Skip to comments.
Pleasure boat carrying guns seized in New York Harbor
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/ny-bc-nj--boatseized0829aug29,0,4934923.story?coll=ny-ap-regional-wire ^
Posted on 08/29/2004 2:17:56 PM PDT by Stew Padasso
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 last
To: Rebelbase
I have a carry permit and I always bring a pistol when I fish. I have a stainless 357 I keep just for this.
81
posted on
08/30/2004 11:01:42 AM PDT
by
TXBSAFH
(Bandwidth is too good for these (L)users.)
To: paul51
I agree. It's not the chili etc that they want. It's the boat. We have a friend in the INS in FLA and he was telling us that drug runners use stolen boats to do their "running" and then sink them after they're done.
82
posted on
08/30/2004 11:57:30 AM PDT
by
gopheraj
To: tsmith130
A Lot of boaters carry machine guns?! Fishing? No, pirates. And I'm not being funny. Piracy is alive and well. In the Carribean, in the Med and most especially in the Western Pacific and Indian oceans.
83
posted on
08/30/2004 2:10:13 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: Dutch Boy
I may be wrong but I think that NY is one of only a few states that forbids Title II permits to persons or corporations You are correct. From the NRA-ILA
(In New York state)
It is a felony for any person to manufacture, transport, or dispose of a machine gun. It is a felony to buy, receive, dispose or conceal a machine gun which has been defaced for the purpose of concealment.
The presence in any room, dwelling, structure or vehicle of any machine gun is presumptive evidence of unlawful possession by all persons occupying the place where the machine gun is found.
84
posted on
08/30/2004 2:14:07 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: snooker
The media doesn't exactly know a machine gun from a semi-auto now do they? No but the coasties do. If they called it a machine gun, it probably was. I'm betting they didn't, because they'd probably just call it a "Full auto" AK-47 or an "assault rifle", rather than a machine gun.
85
posted on
08/30/2004 2:26:53 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: hiredhand
Thank heavens he wasn't caught with a SNIPER RIFLE! Oh don't worry, by the end of the day, the .30 caliber will become one, in certain circles anyway.
86
posted on
08/30/2004 2:53:54 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: El Gato
Don't deny that any of our guys don't know what they are talking about. It's the correct translation that always seems to come out wrong.
87
posted on
08/30/2004 3:21:37 PM PDT
by
snooker
(Looks like the Swifties snookered the dims ...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson