Yes, those are interesting and valid questions. HOWEVER, they are not actually relevant to the election. Sorry to pop the bubble. We may not like Bush's stand on some issues, but those who would not like Bush's answers to those questions are not going to respond by voting for Kerry instead. Such questions are, unfortunately, red herrings at this point.
You: "Mr. President, are you going to stop illegal immigration by building a wall, reduce government spending to less than total revenues, pay off the deficit pronto, and fight hard for XYZ social issues?"
Bush: "No, I'm not. You know I'm not. But the only viable voting option in this election is Kerry, who will do even worse (in your eyes) on these issues, so you're not going to vote for him. You know you prefer me over him, and come November 2 you'll vote for me lest Kerry win. Now, let's stop arguing about issues which do not advance our mutual interests, and campaign against our common opponent."
If it were Bush vs. Keyes, raising those questions might be relevant. Since it's not, you'll just have to deal with voting for the lesser of two evils on those issues.
EXACTLY. The time to publicly whine about our candidate not being conservative enough is during the primary process. Bush is our nominee now, and it's time to get on board or usher him back into office.
Anyone who believes it's better not to vote for Bush because he's not conservative enough---and therefore increase the chance that Kerry is elected---is practicing the utter height of illogic.
LOL. Yes, you have a great point, and that's actually where my opinion stands. I use to be much more opposed to the Bush Admin, but now realize, especially after M Moore's lies, how badly all conservatives need to side with the best option we have at this time. Kerry is far far worse - and likely the key to Hilary's coronation.