To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
Beware of Zombie technologies.
3 posted on
08/31/2004 4:51:21 PM PDT by
Jeff Gordon
(LWS - Legislating While Stupid. Someone should make this illegal.)
To: LibWhacker
This thing is like a freakin' zombie--you just can't kill it!
4 posted on
08/31/2004 4:52:05 PM PDT by
ECM
To: LibWhacker
If cold fusion can be made into a commercial technology, Saudi Arabia's oil reserves will greatly decrease in value.
6 posted on
08/31/2004 4:56:45 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: LibWhacker
Is the Department of the Navy here playing the role that Bell Labs used to ?
To: Diogenesis
10 posted on
08/31/2004 5:01:56 PM PDT by
dennisw
(Allah FUBAR!)
To: LibWhacker
I love news like this. It restores my hope that maybe the government finally will pay for the time-machine research I'm conducting in my bathtub.
13 posted on
08/31/2004 5:04:12 PM PDT by
el_chupacabra
(I'm glad you were born.)
To: LibWhacker
14 posted on
08/31/2004 5:06:50 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Who was Madame Binh's messenger boy?)
To: LibWhacker
Pons is no longer involved in the field, having dropped from view after a laboratory he joined in southern France ceased operations.Hopefully Stanley has been working on something truly useful -- like intelligent design.
20 posted on
08/31/2004 5:18:17 PM PDT by
laredo44
(Liberty is not the problem)
To: LibWhacker
21 posted on
08/31/2004 5:22:16 PM PDT by
flada
To: LibWhacker
Al Gore invented Cold Fusion. If you don't believe me you can just cheese off. (also, algore invented the modern hat).
29 posted on
08/31/2004 5:40:13 PM PDT by
searchandrecovery
(Socialist America - diseased and dysfunctional.)
To: LibWhacker
Plain old fission is a sure thing. Wouldn't it be better to step it up? And also why do we neglect the research on hot fusion - downsize it in the US and stall it in ITER? Inquiring minds want to know?
To: LibWhacker
Yippeee!!!! And about time.
48 posted on
08/31/2004 8:26:12 PM PDT by
hershey
To: LibWhacker
Not to be confused with CFML
50 posted on
08/31/2004 9:21:45 PM PDT by
Conservomax
(There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
To: LibWhacker
I'm all for cold fusion research. The U.S. is the most technologically innovative country and there should be more money going to alternative energy research. Anything to reduce oil dependence sounds good to me.
To: LibWhacker
If the Navy is indeed working on it ... wow.
55 posted on
08/31/2004 11:53:02 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
To: LibWhacker
I'll stick with ASP.NET...no wait...wrong Cold Fusion...nevermind.
57 posted on
09/01/2004 7:46:29 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: LibWhacker
The only debate on this subject has been: How does it works, instead of if it works.
The fact that it does produce more energy has been well documented. The exact physics involved it still open for debate.
Beware of fads like "global warming" and only focus upon the factual information. For some strange reason, the current fad is that cold fusion was a classic example of false science.
I will continue to keep an open mind on the subject and evaluate all factual information submitted on this topic.
59 posted on
09/01/2004 8:40:41 PM PDT by
Hunble
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
