To: neverdem
What a delusioned dumbass to think that the cure to a bad law is another bad law.
5 posted on
09/01/2004 10:34:22 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Exactly what I was thinking.
6 posted on
09/01/2004 10:42:25 AM PDT by
WHBates
To: Blood of Tyrants
It's OK, he's a Republican. They're on our side, remember? ;-)
To: Blood of Tyrants
I feel much better, knowing that politicians and bureaucrats are going to protect us from too much unrestricted free speech.
25 posted on
09/01/2004 12:10:33 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Agree. Apparently he has never heard of the "Law of Unintended Consequences"?
43 posted on
09/01/2004 6:23:05 PM PDT by
lawdog
To: Blood of Tyrants
"What a delusioned dumbass to think that the cure to a bad law is another bad law."
Bob Ney OPPOSED McCain-Feingold. He was the lead sponsor of the alternative measure that would have preserved our First Amendment rights. Unfortunately, his measure failed, and McCain-Feingold was approved by both Houses and, in arguably the worst blunder of George W. Bush's first term, signed into law. Since it will be impossible to get the votes to repeal McCain-Feingold, I don't think it is unfair or unwise for Ney to propose that the rules that apply to everyone else apply with equal force to 527s.
51 posted on
09/02/2004 3:24:08 PM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson