Posted on 09/02/2004 9:45:27 AM PDT by Howlin
I'm glad you watched it again. Evidence of openmindedness. I am not gaga over polling results, but recent polls would seem to indicate that there was something in the speech that got to at least a few of those who couldn't figure out which way to jump. I hope the dims keep misunderestimating W. :)
I believe those polls were taken before W's speech. I am almost inclined to believe the LA Times hyped the polls a bit so that the deflation in later polls would seem more severe. In know, tin foil hat stuff. But, the LA Times poll seems a bit high.
I hope the dims keep misunderestimating W. :)
So do I :o)
Not so tin foil hat at all. I have no doubt they would try to manipulate public opinion. Did you, for example, see the AP story about people booing at a rally when the president mentioned Clinton's hospitalization? If it isn't close, they can't steal it!!!!
Yes. That's like the Reuters editor who sent a nasty e-mail to a pro-life group. Blatant bias.
If it isn't close, they can't steal it!!!!
Exactly.
Correction: The poll I was thinking of is not from the LA TIMES. It's actually a TIME poll (TIME magazine). Sorry about that.
"The poll I was thinking of is not from the LA TIMES"
Your point is still valid nonetheless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.