Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: orangelobster
There's nothing immoral or radical about that

Then you shouldn't have a problem letting the voters in Michigan decide for themselves whether it's "immoral or radical".

The voters in Missouri decided 70 to 30 that it was.

19 posted on 09/03/2004 10:06:12 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Graybeard - Illinois resident - Keyes voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: COURAGE
Ping

What do you think about this developement?

21 posted on 09/03/2004 10:13:14 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Graybeard - Illinois resident - Keyes voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Yes, the Michigan voters should vote on it. What I'm saying is that there have always been gay people, there always will be whether you like it or not. It serves no purpose to withhold tax breaks, inheritence rights, rights to insurance etc. from them. I think that a lot of republicans feel threatened when they see flamboyant gay demonstrations on TV, but under all that overstatement, they just want basic rights that are identical to core rights that republicans endorse. Instead of getting uptight about their natural inclinations I think republicans should be more cool headed. I'm in new york here, so I'm more in the guiliani/pataki camp on this.


25 posted on 09/03/2004 10:30:01 AM PDT by orangelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson