So, are you saying it might not be true, or a very broad twisting of the truth? It really doesn't sound like something the Libertarian Party would do.
I'm saying that its an opinionated hit piece from a anti-libertarian weirdo who happens to work for that WSJ website.
I don't follow, nor do I try to defend the opinions of Libertarian Party members. Most of them are no longer libertarians in my book.
I support the position of the RLC, just as I posted earlier.